Skip to main content

Fostering Our Dependence on God

One of the great paradoxes almost universally overlooked by stalwart Christian parents the world over, is how such parents strive to teach their children how to be independent in life but dependent in religion, as if the latter is the only and necessary means of obtaining the former. In fact, Conservative Christians loath the idea that anyone should be dependent upon "big government" for anything at all, even as they practically demand that everyone is, and should be, dependent upon God (i.e. their Church and their religion) for everything!

What parent thinks it is best to raise a child to forever need to rely on their parents? What parent thinks the best way to raise a child is by first teaching the child they are flawed and sinful, but by devoting themselves to loving and worshiping them alone, the parent promises to make that child better?  And yet, this is exactly what St. Augustine is applauded for doing to Christians.

Basically, St. Augustine argued that everyone bares the stain of Adam & Eve's "original sin" of disobedience to God, in the Garden of Eden. Thankfully, humanity was able to obtain forgiveness for that "sin" by savagely murdering God himself, in the form of Jesus, and by doing so, all was made right with the world (except for all of the brutal wars and sin that has raged around the world ever since - apparently the "Jesus fix" didn't take so well).

Unlike St. Augustine's belief that everyone was born with the stain of original sin (that God, like a doctor being stingy with his cures, choose to withhold partially from Mary and totally from Jesus  - but NO ONE ELSE!) Pelgaius disagreed, and felt that people were not encumbered by the sins of those who came before them. Pelgaius's view was defended by his disciple Caelestius and finally Julian of Eclanum, whom Augustine battled with theologically up to his death in 430 A. D.


The Original Sin of St. Augustine

What St. Augustine was really battling, however, was not Plegaius, Caelestius, or Julian of Eclanum, but his own sins in the brothels of Rome. 

St. Augustine had spent his youth whoring around Rome, where there were brothels aplenty, only to become so disgusted with himself because of his unbridled sexual exploits that he became convinced that no one else should have to suffer the same pleasures that he had subjected himself too. 

As such, his entire theology is then informed by his own disgust for his own "original sin," which convinced him that there must be something in him that predisposes him to enjoying the pleasures of the flesh, that he had only so recently decided he had grown sick of. That predisposition must be "original sin," and not his own raging hormones.

This concept only ensured that people would need to depend on God, and more importantly, the worldly and wise Catholic Church (i.e. the new Sanhedrin) for the rest of their miserable lives. And all for simply a chance - just the lottery of a chance - that by obeying what this earthly Church commands, they will please God enough to NOT be thrown forever into a lake of fire. 

Yet fostering such complete emotional and intellectual dependence on a "Church" to cure and save people from a "disease" called "original sin" only empowers the Church at the expense of all those who, like St. Augustine, are unable and unwillingly to accept full responsibility for their own actions on the one hand, and that not everyone is exactly like St. Augustine (who was so clearly unable to control his sexual urges, and mostly because of his own raging hormones, that he decided women were were as bad as the devil) on the other.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...