Skip to main content

MacBeth as Messiah

The most rabid of Christians, like the most rabid of Muslims, have fallen hopelessly in love with their own minds, and the belief that their own convictions are actually "infallible, universal truths" that come from, and indeed reflect, the will of God Himself - the creator and moral author of the universe.

(That such a God famously ignores such "moral" laws, and often commands his "faithful" flocks to do the same, never causes a single "follower" of such "beliefs" to question the blatant contradiction, that atheists forever implore them to consider as the "truest" fruit of their faith, is a miracle of denial that would even make the Devil green with envy.)

As such, they look at the world and "know," with absolute certainty, that they are infallibly "right" in all they proclaim about the nature of virtually everything, especially anything in any way related to sex.

That they proclaim to be "humble" in this absolute certitude (at least publicly, regardless of what their own personal doubts may be - because they feel they can never show such "weakness" to others, apparently), to the point that they see it as the highest virtue of all to die as martyrs for their all too human "beliefs" about what it means to be human, only proves how a pride far greater than Milton's Lucifer can so easily be concealed behind a curtain of priestly robes, all of whom agree only that they each have "infallible" knowledge of the infinite mind of a God that is infinitely more complex than ourselves.

In truth, however, none of them as individuals actually ever really agree on which interpretation of that "infallible knowledge" is necessarily the right one, in every detail, as any cursory conversation about ethics and morality with a couple of priests will reveal. That's part of why so many of them dislike Pope Francis, for example.
 
 But they do, nevertheless, believe that their collective differences are the very cauldrons brew from which they can divine what it is, even as they deny that people who are not as 'ordained' as they are, not only have no right to contributing to that interpretation (which only ever serves first to strengthen the absolute importance of the Church itself to the "believer"), but have a duty to follow whatever the Church says it is.

And perhaps most ironic of all, by far, is that they actually claim, and Christians actually are willing to believe, that all of this is truly an act of undeniable humility. And they "know" this for sure, of course, because the entire universe was made by the most all powerful God ever, specifically for us, and no one and nothing else.
 
Period.

"Double, double, toil and trouble, fire burn and cauldron bubble."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...