Skip to main content

Why Religion is the Opposite of Responsibility

One of the great ironies of religion is it's insistence that a person must take responsibility for their actions. How else can one be expected to deserve the fires of hell or the pleasures of heaven?


But Christianity is quite the paradox in this regard. And this is because Christ himself supposedly died blameless, on the one hand, and Christians always insist that Heaven is a reward that cannot be obtained through our actions, on the other.


So, according to the Christian perspective, a person can never earn the reward of heaven, they can only ask and receive it through God's loving grace. This therefore removes pretty much all of the responsibility tied to the concept of Christianity, since the only thing a person is held responsible for, in this respect, is not any of the actions they may have engaged in over the course of their life, but whether they ever thought to ask for "forgiveness" for engaging in those actions.


It therefore matters not if one lives the life of Sir Isaac Newton, who was so proud of maintaining his virginity for his entire life, or Adolf Hitler.  For through their actions, neither has "earned" heaven any more than the other, for the most part. By the Christian reasoning, then, if it was only Hitler who thought to apologize for his dastardly ways upon his death, and Newton with his head in the stars  who plum forget to do so, it is only the former who was responsible enough for their life to have deserved heaven, and the other who had earned hell through the unforgivable mistake of having forgotten to ask for forgiveness.


Add to this the fact that Christians generally do not take responsibility for their vices any more than they feel they should be glorified for their virtues, since the devil is behind the former and the holy spirit is said to have animated the latter.


Forgiveness, therefore, is the fly in the ointment of religion, for even as religion preaches eternal damnation as every human beings just deserves, and for no other reason than just being born (we only deserve it all the more with each day we live thereafter), we are incapable of earning our reward. The sin for which we are all so deserving of hell from the moment we are conceived according to religion is not our own, since it traces its origins back to Adam and Eve, and then the murder of Christ himself, and neither is our redemption, which was only achieved by Christ having risen from the dead.


Rather, we are only too deserving of hell and woefully incapable of ever doing enough to earn the right to heaven. Instead, we must time our death most perfectly to have asked for forgiveness at the exact moment of our demise so that we may enter the great hereafter without the blemish of mortal sin, for which we are told will damn us for all eternity.


But if we are fortunate to have asked for forgiveness at the exact moment we slip the surely bonds of earth, then no amount of genocide or sin could ever be more than God can expunge from the record, so that he can welcome us with loving arms to the heavenly reward that we had less responsibility for earning than the hell we all so justly deserve.


And at the pearly gates, one expects to see a long line of Christians arguing tooth and nail that it was the devil who made me do it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...