Skip to main content

Love on Command

It has apparently never occurred to a single Christian just how patently absurd it is to think that we must "love each other" simply because a "God" commands us to do so, especially after we are likewise 'commanded' to believe that some of us are so loathsome and evil that we deserve to be roasted alive for all of eternity.

This is a bit like Hitler "commanding" his Nazi party to love Jews, even though the Nazi's were also commanded by Hitler to "believe" that all Jews deserve to be roasted alive inside an oven at Auschwitz.

The reason Christians have never considered just how absurd it is that they MUST "love each other," even if they only really hate each other, is because they are programmed not to think about anything that ever seriously contradicts the "beliefs" they are commanded to accept as true, no matter how false they clearly are, lest they be roasted for all eternity themselves for daring to think otherwise.

Yet anyone who is willingly to exercise their own mind on a greater level than a 6 year old can easily see just how truly ridicules it is to think that all of life boils down to our willingness, and indeed our ability, to love on command.

Imagine basing you marriage, not on an act of voluntary love, by on "love on command." Indeed, there is perhaps nothing more insane than the thought that people can be "commanded" to have an emotion, especially under the threat of eternal torture if they fail to do so, and then concluding that the very emotion those people are "commanded"to have under the threat of that torture, is somehow an act of "free will."

But this only suggests that the Christian is as trainable and as mindless as a lapdog, and as bogus in their beliefs as they are insincere in their affections.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...