Skip to main content

Why the Bible Flood is to Blame for All Genocide

In the Bible, God decided that the people he had created, addled with the stain of "original sin" that He chose to allow them all to be born with, were just too "evil" to be allowed to live. So he decided to kill them all.

Christians want people not to think too much about this, of course, because even though God must have fully known he would eventually murder all of the people he had created with a great flood, God's "righteousness" is always far greater than any system of "universal natural law" that He offends in exercising it. Praise Jesus!

What God does by killing all of the sinful bastards he had created with a flood, is set an example that he clearly demands his subsequent "children" must follow. After all, Jesus even tells us that, to avoid the fires of hell, we must strive to always "be like God." That the serpent in the Garden of Eden tempted Adam & Eve to engage in the "original sin" using the exact same desire, is always ignored by Christians.

Hence, to be like God is break the rules, in short. It is to kill anyone who fails to be live up to the standard that God (or his "believers") command people must live up to.

So, when the serpent said to Adam & Eve that by eating the fruit of that tree "they would become like God," what he meant was that by NOT obeying the rules, they would become like God, since God so clearly ignores the moral laws that he commands his human subjects to obey. That's why God can kill everyone o the planet and still be loved by people who call Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot "evil" for essentially doing the same thing. Ergo, to be like God is to ignore the rules set by God, since that is what God has always done.

For such "believers," the greatest sin in the world, and in fact all of the worlds problems, are always the result of people failing to "be like God." And as such, those "believers" believe it is their responsibility to correct such ungodly behaviors, by "being like God" themselves, and murdering the "unbelievers" in mass.

This is clearly what the Old Testament taught, and the Christians who based their "beliefs" on being like their God, Jesus, only ever strive to surpass the genocide of the Old Testament using the latest technology that God had helped humanity to produce.

Hence, to "be like God" is to kill all those who are not "being like God," which is exactly what God did with the flood in the first place. And every genocide that has ever followed is clearly the exercise of children who are only ever trying to "be like God" so they can save themselves from the hell that their Holy Father has prepared for them for failing to do so.

Oh Glory Glory gory gory hallelujah!  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...