Skip to main content

The Problem of Violence & Universal Ambivalence

Human Universals is a book by Donald Brown, an American professor of anthropology (emeritus) who worked at the University of California, Santa Barbara. It was published by McGraw Hill in 1991. Brown says human universals, "comprise those features of culture, society, language, behavior, and psyche for which there are no known exception."

According to Brown, there are many universals common to all human societies. One of those universals is ambivalence. Ambivalence is having mixed feelings or contradictory ideas about something or someone. And this applies to no one and nothing as much as God and the devil

God of the Christian Bible, through a willingness to use violence and torture to punish and teach wayward sinners, therefore creates a universal problem for all of humanity, for which there is no possible solution. 

What's the problem? 

Well, every act of violence can always lend itself to interpretation, even by people who may be quite insane. Abraham's willingness to knife his own son to death out of obedience to a voice is no different than Jack Torrance trying to murder his son Danny Torrance with an ax for the same thing. Yet one is seen as a saint of virtue and the other as a serial killer for evil.

Assuming that the vast majority of people are not insane, as both Abraham and Jack Torrance appear to be, we still have the problem of being a species who are designed to exhibit mixed feelings about any act of injustice, violence, or "evil." 

This means that whenever there is an act of violence, or "evil," we can never know whether that act is the result of the devil or God, or the result of God allowing the devil to perform such an act. In addition to never being able to tell the difference between any given act of violence being from God or from the devil, we can also never know for sure whether such an act is to educate us of the nature of evil and the devil, or to punish us for angering God for our sins. 

This simple problem ensures all evil can always been seen as a virtue, just as much as it can always be seen as a vice. It just depends on your perspective on whether we should see the perpetrator as Abraham or Jack Torrance, and ourselves as either Isaac or Danny Torrance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...