Skip to main content

Are Religious Beliefs Intrinsically Evil?


I do not think a belief in something like Christianity is necessarily intrinsically evil - although I am willing to consider, as Nietzsche did, that it might be. A belief is simply an interpretation of reality, after all, but it is not “real." Or, that is to say, it is only as "real" as we choose to make it. The problem comes when we start wanting others to accept that our beliefs are "real" and "true" while theirs are not. 

Generally, a belief can be good, bad, or neutral; but sometimes it is hard to tell the difference, and sometimes even a "good belief" can be believed in so strongly it actually becomes a "bad belief." And one of the ways this happens is when that "good" belief is held so strongly that it can be used to cover up any number of evils. 

For example, even if the Christian "belief" was proven to be perfectly true and intrinsically "good," it was still people's blind devotion to that "truth" that led so many of them to either conceal, or pressure others to conceal, the child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Pedophile priests, in other words, used people's devotion to their faith to prey upon their children. And all because these parents, once the abuse had occurred, were more interested in protecting their "beliefs" and their "church," than they were in protecting their own children, or even the children of others. 

Such concealment, by both friends and family alike, was not the result of indifference or malice toward the victims, of course, but was simply the result of fear. After all, what would they look like to their deeply Catholic friends, and how would they be treated in their deeply Catholic communities, if they were to accuse the church - and in a sense, God - of so vile an act? And even worse, what would happen if they could not prove their accusation in court? Indeed, just think of how difficult it is for a woman to report being raped, and for some, accusing the church of raping their child may seem even more difficult than that. 

Marlon Brando talked about this kind of devotion to a belief in the documentary, "Talk To Me, Marlon." He was commenting on how Americans had bought into the lie that was the Vietnam War, as the release of the Pentagon Papers in 1975 by Daniel Ellsberg would later prove. "They had these people so hog-washed," Brando said, " that rather than alter their beliefs, they sacrificed their children." Rather than accept the idea that their government was lying to them, more to the point, they choose to send their sons to die in a war on the other side of the world; and all for the "love" of God and country.  

Another example would be when a belief in a peaceful, self-sacrificing Christ is "believed in" in such a way, and with such blind devotion to those who claim to speak authoritatively for that belief – whether it be Hitler or the Pope - that whole societies of Christians think it practically their moral duty to either burn witches for God (as they did in the 16th and 17th centuries) or kill Jews for The Third Reich.

To put it in Christian terms, then, a belief is “bad,” therefore, whenever it becomes the mob mentality of the majority, and is then used as the measure of all moral “truth,” for everyone, in everything from sex to how one should keep holy the Sabbath – even if they would rather not keep it holy at all!  It is also bad to the extent it hurts and divides (which, to me, is symbolized in the pain of Christ and the “dividing” of his garments, as well as the division of his blood from his body – hence, death - which are also symbols of the the suffering of the Jewish people via the Diaspora, and so on), and good only to the extent it heals and unites (as symbolized by Christ’s forgiveness of sins and his resurrection – i.e. the re-unification of people as well as the reunification of his blood with his body).

For me, in other words, any belief that separates people in anyway, is bad, and therefore deserves - indeed therefore needs - to be questioned, as Nora Bateson put it in her documentary An Ecology of Mind, “until it bleeds with the authenticity of the un-separated.”  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...