Skip to main content

God & Morality in a Multiverse

People who believe in God often rely on arguments about the nature of free will, evil, and morality to support their claim that their particular idea of "God" is true. But in a multiverse, where our universe is simply one universe in a potentially infinite number of universes, all of these arguments prove completely meaningless.


If evil and free will are necessary aspects of our universe that point to a universal morality that comes from God, as so many Christian theologians often argue, than what are we to make of the possibility of an infinite number of other universes that may exist, where no such free will or evil may exist at all?  


Indeed, all of the aspects of this universe that Christians rely on as evidence of an "intelligent designer," may only exist in their present form in this universe alone. Hence other possible universes may not only be perfect replica's of our own where every possible outcome is played out into ad infinitum, but where infinitely more universes  may also exist where the properties of this universe are slightly to completely different.


By this measure, if we are born into this world to "learn" some things before going to hell or heaven  would suggest that we may then need to be born into an infinite number of such universes as well, even those universes where all of the properties of time and space, and indeed right and wrong, cause and effect, are complete reversed.


In short, our universe may be like a single cell in an ever growing body of universes, where none of the cells is governed by the same DNA as any other, including our own minds. In such a world, God is not simply a reflection of what neuroscientists call our own personal and subjective reality tunnels, which no two people can share nor can any single person fully appreciate of another, but is simply a product of a mind that is itself nothing but a super computer reflecting it's environment.


Change the environment, change the God, the same way that changing where we were born would change what religion we are convinced is the "one true faith."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

The Clash of Religious Beliefs with Reality: Over Simplicity in a Hyper Complex World

God is the anthropomorphism of  our hope that life has a "happily ever after" ending, where there is no such thing as death and suffering, which we anthropomorphize in the form of the devil. In a sense, we are taking ideas and turning them into phantom figures of our selves, with angles and demons being projections of our own souls and our penchant for good and evil.  We see this when we anthropomorphize the act of gift giving into Santa Clause and think in terms of "old man winter" and "father time." We even reverse this process by describing ourselves as living in the springtime of our youth or the autumn of our years.  Religion takes this habit to another level, however, and teaches people to "believe" that the personifications we rely on to describe our hopes and fears are actual "beings;" beings from whom all of the characteristics we tend to associate with ideas of life and death, good and evil, necessarily emanate. Thi...