Skip to main content

Republican Rwanda: The Divided States of America

If you watched the Frontline two part special on the Obama presidency, you may have noticed the parallels between what is being done in America by Republicans and what happened in Rwanda prior to the genocide in 1994. That parallel is right wing propaganda being used to sow the seeds of fear and rage based purely on lies.


Leading up to the genocide in 1994, in both churches and on radios in Rwanda,  a massive propaganda war was being waged as misinformation was used to intentionally sow the seeds of fear and rage in the Hutu majority. Like America today, that fear and rage came from a concerted effort, by both Christian churches and talk show radio hosts, to convince the Hutus that the Tutsis where about to take power in Rwanda, and enact policies that would result in the oppression and even murder of Hutus.


That fear spread like a virus across the minds of the Hutu majority in the days leading up to the genocide. And when the plane carrying both the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi crashed, the Tutsi were blamed, and the genocide began shortly thereafter as a reprisal.


In America today, the exact same thing is happening.


In Divided States of America, the elephant that the show never mentions is how the attacks on Obama had very little to do with him being black or a democrat, and everything to do with spreading fear and rage.


If a Republican president had been in power when the banks sabotaged the global economy, they would most likely have pushed for the same bailouts that Obama pushed for. After all,  as everyone knows, America is run by Government Sachs.


But Conservative talk show hosts looking to increase their listener base, from Rush Limbaugh to Glenn Beck and Alex Jones, used Obama's attempt to save the financial institutions that run the world to spread hated and fear, by deliberately mischaracterizing Liberals and Democrats as communists, fascists, and Marxists, who are all out to destroy the world and install a New World Order.


That any president - whether Republican or Democrat - would've done the exact same thing is not only completely irrelevant, but is vehemently denied by those who get paid massive amounts of money to enrage their audience by selling the lie that Marxist democrats should be feared more than the KKK or the religious/alt-right.


Fear of extremists on all sides of the political spectrum has always been used to gain power and audience market share. If Obama had NOT bailed out the banks, he still would've been tarred and feathered by conservative pundits as a Marxist Socialist Muslim who is hell bent on destroying America.   That's why it is so ironic that Conservatives now applaud Trump as their capitalist messiah, even though Trump has admitted that the Russians (the REAL Marxist Socialists) helped him to win the presidency of the United States.


In short - our greatest enemy is NOT each other, but all those who are paid handsomely to convince us otherwise.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...