Skip to main content

Transgenderism: Cells in the Body of Christ

In 1910, the obscure American writer, Wallace Wattles, wrote A New Christ.  In it, he pointed out the very thing the Catholic Church has been saying all along - that "the body of Christ" is not necessarily an ethereal being beyond the veil of material existence, but in fact the human race. That's why the Bible says that when we see each other, we are looking at the "face of God." And if we really wanted to learn anything about God, (i.e. the "human race," i.e. "the body of Christ") we might discover that we are as infinite in our genetic combinations as the Christian claims God is infinite in His ability to combine those genetics in each of us uniquely.

We are not computers manufactured in a uterus to be either a Mac or a Microsoft, in other words, or simply just a male or just a female. Our genetic differences, and thus our ideas of gender and sexuality more specifically, are as unique to each of us as our own fingerprint. In fact, the neurological mapping of our mind is as unique to each of us as our fingerprint, much like our genetics as well, and thus our experience as a human being. There is not one correct way to be "human," as if there is one correct way to be a particular gender or one correct way to be sexual, or emotional, or anything else, and all others are "wrong!"

We are not cookie cut outs of Christ, despite so many "Christians" demanding we are, carried into the world through the conveyor belt of a mothers womb.  And because of the universe of genetics and chromosomes that we are made of, understanding transgenderism may be the key to understanding humanity itself, especially since  biologists have concluded that all of humanity started out as hermaphrodites.

As such, trying to "understand God" requires more than simply obsessing over highly ambiguous and polysemous lines of poetry, which were scribbled by countless unknown authors over thousands of years and compiled into a tome we refer to today as "the Bible," but in understanding the very biology of humanity itself. For indeed, if humanity constitutes "the body of Christ," as the Church so often insists, than the diversity of humanity is no different than the diversity of cells that populate the different organs of the human body; and if we are to understand anything at all about "God," than we must first start with learning something about ourselves, no matter how uncomfortable such self exploration may be.

 But rather than do this, most Christians obsess singularly on an ancient and antiquated book of "ideas" about God, rather than looking at "God" (i.e. humanity) himself. This is like a person who ignores what their body is telling them because they are too obsessed with the perfection of their own soul, as if flesh is temporary but thoughts are eternal. Like Narcissus, this is an invitation to fall desperately in love with the reflection of our own ideals about what we "think" it means to be human, by ignoring the infinite diversity of humanity that surrounds us. 

Like the drowning man who prays ceaselessly for God to save him, but repeatedly ignores the boat, the submarine and the helicopter that show up and offer to actually save him, we would rather drown for our "beliefs" about God, rather than accept the "truth" God has sent us. The boat, submarine and helicopter, in other words, are the "evidence" that we choose to ignore at our own peril, out of a preference for "believing" we understand the "truth" about  God by ignoring what science has to say about humanity, and choosing instead to simply "pray" our way to understanding everything there is to understand.

And in this way, we willingly crucify "the body of Christ" (by condemning anyone who fails to live up to our ideals about what it means to be as super human as a "Holy Christ") by falling in love with an idealized fantasy of infinite human perfection.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin