Skip to main content

Allegory of the Ruse

Caves appear to have always been a part of the religious idea. More than 40,000 years ago at Shanidar cave, for example, "Neanderthals interred the bodies of their beloved dead, creating a sacred space and a dwelling for the spirits."

As a result, caves "then became sacred spaces where the living could receive enlightenment, as at Lascaux and Altamira."

 In fact, "the cave is an important element in many religious cults. In Mayan ceremonial centers, for example, nearby caves were filled with offerings—obviously places of cult worship. At the Acropolis, the cave was a great symbol of religious enlightenment and experience."

These  caves were  tombs, which begs the question of whether people thought they could gleam enlightenment from their deceased relatives or from a god or gods,  or if there was any real difference between the two.

And from the caves, humanity domesticated itself into temples, and applauded itself for being humble enough to stand in awe of itself, and call it God. 

This makes it incredibly ironic that Catholic theologians like St. Augustine ever used the writings and ideas of Plato to support the legitimacy of Catholicism, since Plato's Allegory of the Cave was therefore an indictment of the very same religions that had saw fit to execute his mentor, who was said to be "the wisest man in all of Greece," Socrates.

And what's really crazy about that, is that the Gnostic gospels tend to agree much more with Plato's assessment that organized religions cast shadows on walls, than Augustine's claim that Plato's "logos" was referring to the Catholic God.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...