Skip to main content

Pornography & Religion: Two Sides of the Same Deception

Pornography is used in a society for the same reason that religion is used in a society. Both are forms of lust: one physical and the other spiritual. And both are simply means of managing people, one with the pleasures of the flesh and the other with the pleasures of faith.

Both are equally as seductive in the ideas they offer, since the physical lust that seduces the body is no less potent a drug than the spiritual lust that seduces the mind. In fact, that spiritual lust for perfection through the mind is today doing far more damage through the pseudo-scientific religions of economics and politics and race, than Christianity ever did through its pseudo-spiritualism. Indeed, the new religions and the new gods are doing it even more effectively than the old religions and gods, of the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans: that trinity of mythologies that seduced the minds of Europe with the apple of Christianity.

Religion is used to convince people that things are "true" if you simply "believe" they are. From invisible friends called "saints" and "angels" to a personal savior named "Jesus"who puts divine insights into their heads as a reward for simply "believing" he does, believers simply "believe" that their "beliefs" entitle them to an eternal paradises of every degree imaginable. They also believe that anyone who is dumb and blind enough to doubt such beliefs necessarily true, deserves no less than a horrible death followed by an eternity of torture.

And pornography, an ideal of sex that drips with as much carnal lust as the spiritual narcissist has for their own eternal soul, draws us into a fantasy as potentially as violent and devoid of love as is so often the case with religion, with both relying on the nomenclature of love. And the people who produce the one are the very same people who produced the other. Both, after all, are simply different means of controlling a people, by both keeping them equally distracted from reality, and hiding from the people who condemn it on Sunday that they are the same ones who consume it throughout the rest of the week, and buying both from the very same kind of people, who are simply offering us two sides of the same seductive deception.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...