Skip to main content

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part IV

With or without religion you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. 

 Stephen Weinberg

 

Welcome to part four of our consideration of the Christian idea that, according to the Roman Catholic priest, Fr. Emmett Carter, "God's punishments are just, medicinal, and restorative." (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/)

But are they? And according to whom? Those doling out the punishments, or those upon whom such punishments are being inflicted?

This idea is ironic, considering that the "punishment" being referred to is either the eternal punishment of hell or some temporary punishment while here on earth. If it is the former, it can never be restorative to the one being punished, and its eternal duration suggests it never restores the punisher either. 

If such punishment refers to temporary suffering while here on earth, then we are left to wonder what form of "punishment" we are referring to. Is it punishment doled out by God via floods, famine or disease, as we see in the OT, or punishment doled out by God's "believers" to those deemed (at least by those "believers" anyway) to have brought the judgment of God upon their own heads, even if an "all powerful" God needed his "believers" to inflict the punishment in his stead, also as seen in the OT?

 Put another way, are tsunamis and disease Old Testament punishments from God,  as Glen Beck argued after the tsunami devastated Japan back in 2011, or was the brutality visited upon Native Americans and Africans simply an OT punishment for their failure to be as Christian  - clothed in the "white" robes" of white skin - as European WASPs? 

 When famine and disease befell Christians during the 16 to 18 centuries, rather than interpreting such misfortune as evidence of God's punishment upon Christians who had failed to please their own God, Christians decided to blame "witches" instead. How did they know that witches were real in the first place? Well, since they were required to believe their God was real (to save themselves from eternal fire), that meant so was their "devil." In truth, God and the devil are merely the personification of "good" and "evil," an extra "o" added to the one, and a "d" attached to the face of the other. 

As such, those witches were punished by God, at least as far as Christians were concerned, even if it was Christians who had to do the actual punishing in God's absence (and mostly to prove to themselves he exists in the first place), and violating their own commandments by doing so.Why did God save Isaac from Abraham's knife but not those accused as "witches" from the fires of Christian love? Because those Christians simply had it all wrong, but not for lack of trying. Oh well.

Like the burning of witches and heretics, the violence engaged in by Christians, much like all acts of religious terrorism, is always morally justified by Christians as "punishment" for offending their brand of God. The question is how and why does this happen? 

Well, it starts when Catholic priests make claims like "God's punishment is just, restorative, and medicinal." Why? Because if God is no longer using tsunamis to telegram humans about how displeased he is with us, as Glen Beck argued he was, then who is it that then feels the need to avenge their God, always justifying their actions as "God's punishment, which is always just, restorative, and medicinal"? Who's God, you ask? Well, their own of course, even if its no one else's.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

The Clash of Religious Beliefs with Reality: Over Simplicity in a Hyper Complex World

God is the anthropomorphism of  our hope that life has a "happily ever after" ending, where there is no such thing as death and suffering, which we anthropomorphize in the form of the devil. In a sense, we are taking ideas and turning them into phantom figures of our selves, with angles and demons being projections of our own souls and our penchant for good and evil.  We see this when we anthropomorphize the act of gift giving into Santa Clause and think in terms of "old man winter" and "father time." We even reverse this process by describing ourselves as living in the springtime of our youth or the autumn of our years.  Religion takes this habit to another level, however, and teaches people to "believe" that the personifications we rely on to describe our hopes and fears are actual "beings;" beings from whom all of the characteristics we tend to associate with ideas of life and death, good and evil, necessarily emanate. Thi...