Skip to main content

How Religion Got Rich By Selling Human Helplessness

 A confession of a need for God to save us is actually an admission that we believe God created us in such a way as to require our dependence upon Him for us to survive. How odd. No other species on the planet is designed to need to worship a God for it to survive, either as an individual or as a member of a group or even a species. 

Christianity, as such, teaches us it is a virtue to believe we are incapable of saving ourselves without our total dependence to their brand of God. By accepting we are incapable of solving our own problems, however, we instead yoke all our hopes to a brand of God, and then end up warring with each other over which brand is the one that will actually save us, and which are all causing all of the problems from which we need our "one true faith" to save us. 

We need God, in other words, to save us from killing each other over our different definitions of "God."

Prayers to a God are always about accepting that we are powerless to overcome this problem, and every other, without some supernatural agent using its supernatural energy to help us get over what that "God" allegedly "intelligently designed" us to only be able to overcome with its supernatural assistance. And for anyone who dares to overcome the biggest obstacles in their life without the need to depend upon a God (which really means dependence upon an institutional religion), there's always hell - which God assures us we can never overcome, because he made it, and us, and has decided it is a place we should rot away for all eternity. 

In short, the penalty for daring to think we can save ourselves without God's help is a hell in which God promises not to save us. Makes sense, and seems totally morally justified too. Not. 

Incredibly, Christians don't care who end up in such a torture chamber, just as long as it's not them. With a friend like that, who needs the devil? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...