Skip to main content

The Problem of Performative Kindness

 To strive to be "good" for God, in order to prove oneself worthy of salvation, is to engage in a performative act of kindness. 

Performative acts of kindness are not genuine acts of kindness, because they are motivated less by a selfless desire to help someone, and more out of a need for approval for helping someone in need. 

This is like only helping someone if there is someone around to film it so you can put it on your social media feed in an attempt to attract "likes" and followers. So to, to believe that God is watching our actions to determine we are worthy of salvation, which is like a boss watching our actions to determine whether we should be promoted or fired or a dictator determining whether we should be left alone or imprisoned for thinking the "wrong ideas," is not only to rely on such a perspective to motivate us into "right" or moral behavior, it is to assume that without such motivation, people's natural tendency is to act like rapists and serial killers. Such an 'assumption' is based not on a "love" of God, but a fear of others.

Christianity, as such, is a religion that uses acts of kindness exercised by Christians as evidence of how Christianity makes people more altruistic.  But on the one hand, Christians also disclaim all of the horrible actions performed and justified in the name of Christianity as simply being mere mistakes, while on the other hand, Christians discredit all of the altruistic acts of other religions and atheists as being either insignificant, or largely self-serving (how ironic).

The problem is that people conditioned to equate actions with a group or "church" or community approval are highly susceptible to equating actions that are approved of by a community or church as being "moral," even when the whole community is burning witches and crucifying heretics. Then, in retrospect, later group members simply "forgive" the actions of previous Christians as simply proof that we are all flawed and thus need Christianity. 

This, of course, is circular logic masquerading as "divine revelation," which is like the man behind the curtain pretending to be the Wizard of Oz.  

Whenever we are engaging in an action that is dependent upon a reward or approval from a God or a group, we are engaging in performative art masquerading as altruism. 

Between acts of kindness that are engaged in without expectation of reward or approval and acts of kindness that are in anyway related to or connected with approval of worthiness, the former is morally superior, even as a belief in the Christian brand of God holds up the latter as the moral ideal. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...