Skip to main content

The Problem with Christian Mono-Perception

 "I think the task of philosophy is not to provide answers," said Slavoj Zizak, "but to show how the way we perceive a problem can be itself part of a problem." 

With Zizak's observation about the problem of perception in mind, just think about how Christianity requires you to accept you are a born sinner, incapable of fixing the broken soul you are born with, and thus requiring God to forgive you for a condition you are born with, lest that same "loving" God threatens to cast you into a fire pit for all eternity for daring to doubt such claims as "infallibly true."

Think also about how often women who dared to be non-conformists were accused and executed as "witches," or how often others were accused and executed as "heretics," for daring to think outside of the "sacred" box of acceptable "beliefs" being proscribed in one area of the world or another, 

And who is proscribing those "sacred rules"? Men who claimed to have been given both divine revelations, and divine license to be as awful as the God of the Old Testament to ensure that even the most skeptical were tortured into believing the claims of such men - and ONLY such men, regardless of how immoral such men have nearly always been - that they were indeed given such "divine revelations" by God.

And what happens if you did NOT accept that such men were given divine license to torture you into accepting they had been given divine revelations about what is true, and what is 'God's will'?  Well, the God who gave such men their revelations and the license to torture and kill those who doubted them, will torture you for all eternity.

If philosophy is about seeing how the way we perceive a problem is part of the problem, Christianity  and religion in general is often about seeing anyone who perceives a problem different from how our religion requires us to perceive a problem as the real problem. 

As a result, those who claim to drink the blood of a god claim they have the power to see who is a witch and a heretic, which is basically anyone who disagrees with the former's claim they have been given by god the ability to label the latter, and anyone who says otherwise is the real problem, while those being labeled as witches and heretics by such "believers" know that the real problem is exactly what Slavoj Zizak said it was: the inability to see how the way we perceive a problem is part of the problem. 

Monotheism, in short, is really mono-perceptionism masquerading as divine license to pretend we are infallible, and by so pretending, default to always thinking everyone who disagrees with your own perception is always wrong, because your own perceptions are based on "infallible" truth - and only your devotion to believing your ideas are "infallible" will determine whether you are worthy of being saved, or tortured for all eternity for daring to use your God given skepticism on your religion even half as much as you are required to apply that skepticism to every other perspective in the universe. 

What a great plan! 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...