Skip to main content

The Problem with Christian Mono-Perception

 "I think the task of philosophy is not to provide answers," said Slavoj Zizak, "but to show how the way we perceive a problem can be itself part of a problem." 

With Zizak's observation about the problem of perception in mind, just think about how Christianity requires you to accept you are a born sinner, incapable of fixing the broken soul you are born with, and thus requiring God to forgive you for a condition you are born with, lest that same "loving" God threatens to cast you into a fire pit for all eternity for daring to doubt such claims as "infallibly true."

Think also about how often women who dared to be non-conformists were accused and executed as "witches," or how often others were accused and executed as "heretics," for daring to think outside of the "sacred" box of acceptable "beliefs" being proscribed in one area of the world or another, 

And who is proscribing those "sacred rules"? Men who claimed to have been given both divine revelations, and divine license to be as awful as the God of the Old Testament to ensure that even the most skeptical were tortured into believing the claims of such men - and ONLY such men, regardless of how immoral such men have nearly always been - that they were indeed given such "divine revelations" by God.

And what happens if you did NOT accept that such men were given divine license to torture you into accepting they had been given divine revelations about what is true, and what is 'God's will'?  Well, the God who gave such men their revelations and the license to torture and kill those who doubted them, will torture you for all eternity.

If philosophy is about seeing how the way we perceive a problem is part of the problem, Christianity  and religion in general is often about seeing anyone who perceives a problem different from how our religion requires us to perceive a problem as the real problem. 

As a result, those who claim to drink the blood of a god claim they have the power to see who is a witch and a heretic, which is basically anyone who disagrees with the former's claim they have been given by god the ability to label the latter, and anyone who says otherwise is the real problem, while those being labeled as witches and heretics by such "believers" know that the real problem is exactly what Slavoj Zizak said it was: the inability to see how the way we perceive a problem is part of the problem. 

Monotheism, in short, is really mono-perceptionism masquerading as divine license to pretend we are infallible, and by so pretending, default to always thinking everyone who disagrees with your own perception is always wrong, because your own perceptions are based on "infallible" truth - and only your devotion to believing your ideas are "infallible" will determine whether you are worthy of being saved, or tortured for all eternity for daring to use your God given skepticism on your religion even half as much as you are required to apply that skepticism to every other perspective in the universe. 

What a great plan! 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...