Skip to main content

The Difference Between Sex & Prayer

 Christianity condemns casual sex and masturbation as perhaps the greatest sin. It's one of the famed seven deadly sins, in fact, the sin of lust. Hell, Jesus said even just the thought of lust is a deadly sin.

On the other hand, it also champions the act of praying as one of the greatest virtues. 

But consider the curious contrast between prayer and masturbation.

 While Christianity sees casual sex as purely physical and devoid of emotion, the act of praying is purely emotional devoid of anything physical. One connects a person to their entire body and all of their sensations, while the other disconnects a person from their body and imprisons them in the tower of ideals within the locked room of their own mind.

Praying is a way of asking someone else (God or a saint or an angel or jinni) to do something on your behalf, while telling yourself there's either nothing else you can do anyway, or that praying is the best thing you can do regardless of whatever else you could do.

Christianity therefore condemns physical masturbation as a sin while championing emotional masturbation as  a virtue, for if the former is mindless action the latter is mindful inaction. 

No wonder Mary was "ever virgin" while Jesus had a thing for prostitutes. 

It is also important to understand how sex and prayer reflect a difference prized in Ancient Rome, especially by the first Christians. Sex belonged to the physical body, which received pleasure during the act, while prayer emanated from the mind, which received pleasure during the act as well. Interestingly enough, both stimulate the release of dopamine in our brain, albeit using different triggers to do so.

But because Christians see human flesh as fallen and imperfect, as illustrated by the fact we eventually die, while their "God" is seen as wholly immaterial intelligence,  deriving pleasure from the former is to delight in what is sinful while doing so from the latter is considered "holy."

To save oneself from dying the way the physical body is condemned to do so over the course of life, prayer is offered as a tithing to an omnipotent infinite immaterial consciousness that it may save our own ignorant finite immaterial consciousness from perishing like our flesh, and unify it with its own. 

The sign that such a "God" intends to save the "souls" of such people is illustrated in God becoming "man" in the form of Jesus, and all so such a God could show such "believers" that he could, and would, save their immaterial minds the same way he resurrected Jesus's material body and brain. 

How then can sinful flesh be made in the image and likeness of an immaterial intelligence, and what urge or need led the latter to create the former? And most of all, how can such an "act" of creation of imperfection be interpreted as the result of a perfect creators' "love"? 

 

 

 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...