Skip to main content

Slim Shady

 Christianity convinces you you should feel ashamed of yourself for being creative enough to imagine your own personal version of what the word "God" means to you.

And it wants you to believe you should feel especially ashamed of yourself if your own definition of the word "God" falls outside the parameters it uses to box in such an infinite abstraction.

 Those parameters act like a skeleton onto which any image can be fashioned, whether it's in the form of flesh and blood like Jesus, or a Holy Ghost and heavenly father, "who art in heaven." And by "art" we mean the creative capacity we have to "believe" such a thing is as true as a four year old believing in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy. 

Such parameters also hide  from Christians the fact that each person is looking at a magnified projection of their own ideals, which are therefore as unique as they are, like they are looking in a fun house mirror that makes you infinitely large and powerful, and appear as if your reflection is "divine." The beauty that Narcissus fell in love with was not his reflection in the water, but how he came to believe he was made in the image and likeness of a god. 

This is why no two Christians can always agree about exactly what an infinite abstraction like the word "God" even means, because the word "God" itself can never be exactly defined without a reliance on other abstractions and paradoxes, which is why there are over 40,000 versions of the Christian brand of "God," and they can't stop arguing or killing each other - in a kind of spiritual Darwinistic survival of the fittest - over which definition of "God" is "the real slim shady." 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
Post a Comment
Read more
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...
Post a Comment
Read more