Skip to main content

The Circle of Nature & The Square of Religion

I have said before that, if nature comes from God, then religion comes from the devil. In fact, you could even say that the greatest devil in all of Christianity is God himself, which is the truth, even though every Christian thinks the God they worship is as perfect as they hope one day to be, once they die and are rewarded for pretending to know "God's will" better than everyone else, and all by interpreting a book that said exactly the opposite of what all Christians today think it says.

For the Bible is not a story about a man named Jesus who just also happened to be a God, but about how man is treated by his Gods, for daring to question their wisdom and benevolence.  It is not the story of a man who was a god, but a man who dared to question those who claimed to "believe" their religion came from God.

Jesus is simply the plagiarized story of Socrates, and sold as the ultimate story of religion, rather than of philosophy.  And as the former has only ever sought to call it's "beliefs" the only truth, the latter was about a man who challenged people's "beliefs" about the truth, with the truth itself. 

Hence, religion conflates the truth of something with a "belief" about that same thing, and the two are almost always mirrored opposites, but which are chiral in nature to each other. That is, while the truth and religious belief often seem to reflect each other, it only does so like the left hand reflects the right hand. 

The person who is deconstructing the religious "beliefs" they live in, therefore, in order to construct a more accurate understanding of the truth - when a "belief" and the truth are chiral opposites, like our left hand is to our right -  is engaged in an act of self destruction. 

Why? 

Because the "self" we think we are, is the one that was "intelligently designed" for us by all the religions that came before, and all the religions that people worship even now, which include not just gods but money and biology and science and war. 

Like Micheal Angelo carving the statue of David, which must no doubt have greatly appealed to David's vanity in heaven,  the nature of one must be chiseled free from the block of the other. 

Put another way, religion is a square, and nature is a circle, which is why the devotees of the former have always had such a difficult time fitting one into the other. 

The problem, of course, is that most people simply accept that they are the problem, as their religions teach them from birth - starting with circumcision, as a way of pleasing an immaterial entity by dulling the pleasures of the flesh - and never the religions they subscribe to with such passionate certainty and devotion. 

Of course by believing that it is always ourselves that is the problem, and never the religions we subscribe to, we end up spending as much money at church as we do at the pharmacy or the liquor store. And exactly like what we get at the pharmacy and the liquor store, the thing we rely on to fix ourselves, is also a form of destroying ourselves. 

And always in the service of one religion or another.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...