Skip to main content

God vs Why

 There is no greater curiosity than that of a child. And just as great as that curiosity is the creative process of understanding and assimilating information. God has so designed the human brain and nervous system that it needs to ask why as much as a tree needs water. And in answering that question, which it can in an infinite number of ways, it equally has the ability to design unique answers unto itself! And only our ability to ask and answer such questions is what makes us so unique. In fact, as much as a child needs love to thrive, which they need as much as sleep and water, a child loves to learn by asking why, and just as creatively imagining the answers. 

Doing so only becomes a major problem when such a child insists their own answers are infallible, and everyone else must be crucified and burned for all eternity for daring to say otherwise. 

But then comes the problem - why? 

Christianity teaches parents, via spiritual surrogate parents in the roles of priests and nuns, that children's curiosity must be channeled into a "love" of God - and not just any God, but their own particular brand of such a word. By "love," we really mean fear, since it is impossible to genuinely love that which we cannot understand, especially when we cannot understand why such a "God" needed to torture and punish an innocent Jesus in order to demonstrate his love for us, in order to save us from a hell God alone is responsible for creating and maintaining, rather than punishing and doing away with the devil - who God created, and maintains, and allows to do his worst without the slightest of interruptions - who God blames for luring us to disobey His command to obey a church, regardless of how many pedophiles it employees and protects.

God, so it seems, created children with an insatiable curiosity, in order to create an institutional Church that would then channel that insatiable curiosity into the bottomless well that is the word God, which is a word that is as infinite as it is abstract, signifying nothing as much as it means anything you wish. 

God, as such, wanted an institutional church to act as an intellectual chastity belt on the infinite curiosity he designed us with, in which our brains can only grow by engaging such a curiously, so we would not ask questions that would lead us to see or interpret the word "God" as anything other than how His one "true" institutional Church - the Roman Catholic Church - defines such a word, regardless of how many pedophiles the church protects or other crimes it engages in. What a great plan!

The question to all of this, of course, is why did such a "perfect" God feel compelled to create so sinful humans and command them to worship Him lest he cast them into hell forever for failing to do so, and reward them with eternal heaven for their obedience? What the hell does such a "God" gain from doing any of this?

Why?

It is just such a question, so Christians will assure you, that countless numbers of people deserve to roast for all eternity, not for daring to ask, but for daring to doubt those who parrot back to them as an all encompassing answer, like that Raven from Poe's poem, the single yet meaningless word: "God," as if they want those asking the question to prove they deserve to be spared eternal fires of Auschwitz by being as robotic in their obedience as those offering such an answer are at being a parrot. 

Religion - in short - is an example of invasion of the body snatchers, and in the name of love and God, they will burn you alive if ever you dare to disagree with their claims that they and they alone are as infallible as a pet parrot. And for such parrots, it is impossible to be both free and fully obedient, for they either live in a cage of thinking, repeating like robots what they hear, or they do not, and sing whatever song they wish. The Christian sees the latter as a sin, despite the fact our brains were designed to require such freedom, even as those same Christians demand the freedom to force their own children not to ever exercise such a freedom.

Good birds never ask about the difference! No wonder they give those Polly's so many crackers when they flock together in their cages once a week. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...