Skip to main content

Religious Truama: How Christianity can be "Utterly Aberrant"

Trauma is defined as "an emotional response to an intense event that threatens or causes harm."

For countless numbers of children like myself, Religious Trauma (RT) can therefore be defined as "an emotional response to an intense event that threatens or causes harm, with everything from children being thrown out of their garden home by an irate father for eating forbidden fruit, to apocalyptic floods, crucifixions of the innocent, drinking of blood, days of atonement and threats of hell and purgatory for failing to obey God, being the 'intense event that threatens physical harms which causes emotional harm' like nothing else in the universe." 

The religion being referred to is Christianity, of course. But Christianity need not necessarily always cause RT. When the ultimate focus of the religion is on love, and the other ideas are limited or excluded, no RT may be suffered. But the more threats of hell and a focus on suffering as atonement for one's flaws is increased, the more traumatic the experience of Christianity can be to a child, for the child is defenseless to what they are being taught to believe about both themselves and the world they have been born into. In effect, the child is being taught they are born on a treadmill headed for the mouth of a volcano. And the only way they can avoid being thrown into that volcano is if they obey a Church. )

When faced with the dire threat of eternal torture for failing to obey a Church, mixed with beliefs that suffering makes one like Christ and ensures access to heaven, is it any wonder a child will obey a priest who tells them to engage in illegal sexual activities?  But I digress.

 To illustrate just how much Christianity can indeed operate as the cause of so much trauma to innocent children around the world, even as it also operates to provide hope for being saved from the suffering it may cause, and the tortures is threatens, consider the following quotes from the book, The Myth of Normal by one of the leading educators on trauma today, Dr. Gabor Mate. 

The quote itself is in boldface. And I have broken it up to add my own comments to help to describe how the causes of trauma that Mate is discussing can be found in the traumatizing ideas being used to shape children's minds through Christian education and indoctrination.

 Quote:

"No hominin species could have survived long enough to evolve had its members seen themselves as atomized individuals, pitted by Nature against their fellow beings."

While Christianity publicly claims to be working to make us all one big happy family, in truth, the "family" it desires is one in which everyone must obey the commands of a father who threatens to throw any of his children who do not obey his demands into the furnace in the basement. As such, it preaches community while it sows seeds of division by requiring each child, or each tribe, to obey its rules, and reject every other. Christianity can therefore be understood as essentially forcing people to work on saving others as the only way to save themselves. Hence, it is simply a religion that preaches like a lamb but acts like a self interested wolf that will do whatever it takes to avoid hell and win heaven. Whenever Mate therefore says "self interest," consider how Christianity is about one's ultimate self interest in salvation. No one - not even Jesus - is willing to suffer for all eternity. Doing so allows us to see a truer face of the Christian religion, one in which the primary goal for the "believer" is not about obtaining peace on earth, but avoiding hell and getting the apple of salvation, even if that requires making hell on earth.

 "Contrary to our present ways of operating, a traditional view of self-interest would be enhancing one’s connection and membership in the (diverse) community, to everyone’s benefit. (Even those who believe different from ourselves.) Authentic self-interest need not be conflated with a suspicious and competitive stance toward others."

 Christianity has always been competitive with other religions, but also of different forms of Christianity. There is a long history of conflict between different brands of Christianity, starting with the ones being practiced during the days of St. Augustine up through the Puritans in the colonies and even the Catholics vs the Protestants. It was those differences that Augustine sought to stamp out using torture.

"Hence my working assumption that our nature, all else being equal, expects or even prefers as its baseline state a condition of caring, relative harmony, and equilibrium, of the kind that obtains when interconnectedness rules the day. It is not that our nature is to be those ways, but that it wants them to be present. When they are, we thrive; when denied, we suffer."

It is not our nature to be born sinners, in other words, hell bent on selfishness and self interest, especially in saving our own hide from Hades.

"What to make, then, of the modern received wisdom that we are fundamentally aggressive, selfish? Where does such an idea come from?"

Like the Christian concept of "God," so the entire premise of "original sin" has never been proven, nor an eternal soul to which such a sin is said to be a stain. In is from this "belief" in the stain of original sin that Christians claim to have been given a "divine revelation" that we are born fundamentally selfish and aggressive, and the only thing that can help us with that is to incentivize us into striving for Heaven by teaching us to be scared as hell of Hell.

"Under a capitalist system notions and expressions of human nature will both mirror the individualized, competitive ideal  and justify it as being the inevitable status quo."

 Christianity does the same thing, mirroring the idea that we are sinners in need of saving, and calling anyone who challenges such a status quo a heretic.

It makes sense: if what’s normal is assumed to be natural, the norm will endure; on the other hand, when suspicions emerge that the way things are may not be how they’re meant to be . . . well, the quo may not be status for long. Thus do (Christian) cultures generate notions— myths, in effect—of selfish, aggressive striving and dominance as behavioral baselines, encouraging characteristics that place a lesser value on connectedness to others (i.e., diversity)  and to Nature itself (that is, the natural world, rather than worshiping a spiritual ideal, as if your eternal soul depended on it).

 In our present capitalist society, Darcia Narvaez suggested to me, we have become “species-atypical,” a sobering idea when you think about it: no other species has ever had the ability to be untrue to itself, to forsake its own needs, never mind to convince itself that such is the way things ought to be. (Christianity likewise teaches us to forsake our own needs for those of God and, since he chooses to remain largely inaccessible to our best efforts to know "him," his Church. Martyrdom is a prime example of how a person can come to believe that sacrificing their earthly life will win them eternal life.)

As the following chapters will explore, today’s culture (Christianity on the one hand, and unfettered consumption on the other) hastens human development along unhealthy lines from conception onward (like the stain of original sin idea), leading to a “normal” that, from the perspective of the needs and evolutionary history of our species (a need to feel safe and loved, which we can only feel when we are not constantly judged), is utterly aberrant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...