Skip to main content

My Family Lie

 The problem with my family of Roman Catholics is that they require me to accept their Catholicism as a cure for their problems as infallibly true and that my claim that Catholicism caused and contributed to my own trauma is a delusion (which only their Catholicism can cure).

Hence, to have a relationship with my family, I must accept their delusion as valid and my own experience as invalid. And I was told as much by my brother, the Catholic priest. In other words, i must accept their delusion as real and my own realizations as a delusion.

To have a relationship with my Catholic family, in other words, I must accept their gaslighting as my only truth and, as a result, rely on their moral compass and distrust my own, for my entire life. For them, however, it isn't gaslighting, because as they see it - they're touched by God with infallibility about their religion.

For perspective, it works like this. 

My brother and sister insist they know their "God" is real, even as they equally insist that every other God, and indeed every other version of their Christian God but their very own, is false. 

Ask them to prove it and they will tell you they simply have "faith" that they are infallible in this belief, even as everyone else who may believe the same thing is simply mistaken - but not them. Never them. 

 Then, they insist that the onus is on me to prove their "God" is not real, and that my admission that you cannot prove a negative only proves my disbelief in their brand of God is simply my "belief," which I accept without evidence. Naturally, my brother says this all the time. like a broken parrot, even though he knows full well that my evidence for why I do not believe in his brand of God is his own rejection of everyone else's brand of God but his own. 

My brother believes without evidence, and then claims my disbelief without evidence to prove his brand of God does NOT exist proves my disbelief is as equally without evidence as his belief. He then goes on to start interpreting physical reality in ways that he claims clearly proves his God is real, even as I have already pointed out to him that his intentional interpretation of physical reality as proving the existence of his God does not mean that he is infallibly right. 

I could just as easily begin interpreting all of physical reality as proving the existence of any other God as well, but my brother wouldn't accept that as evidence until billions had accepted the same idea, and practiced it for 2000 years. For my brother, everyone who interprets physical reality in any other way different from his own is therefore wrong, and deserving of eternal torments. His perception of reality, as such, is God's perception of reality, which is why he could care less who ends up in hell, even if it happens to be victims who were sexually abused by Catholic priests. If they end up in hell, as far as he's concerned, they must therefore deserve to be there, and he won't loose a wink of sleep about it, nor will he ever dare to NOT "love" the God who saw fit to put them there.

My brother naturally ignores all of this, as he always does, because he gets his rocks off at the thought of seeing anyone who ever disagreed with him about the only thing that has ever mattered to him be tortured for all eternity. His religion is a spiritual lust for pain of those who doubt his infallibility.

To this, I reply, "prove that you are not Napoleon Bonaparte reborn and you just don't know it. Or, better yet, prove that I am not Jesus Christ, who has returned to tell you your "beliefs" about God are false."

To this, of course, they balk. But they cannot prove I am not Jesus Christ  returned in the flesh any more than I can prove their ideas of Jesus as their God are false, or even that they are Jesus and just don't know it.

So I tell them, I will prove to you that your God is false as soon as you can prove to me, to my satisfaction and not yours, that I am not Jesus Christ, and that you are not the devil.

Hence, by their own reasoning, they must obey me as their Jesus come back to life, and if they cannot prove I am NOT Jesus Christ, they should burn for all eternity in hell, as their just deserves. 

Naturally, they think I am insane to argue such a point, but boast of being both perfectly sane, and perfectly moral, for assuring me that by daring to question their "beliefs" they so love, the God they hope and pray to assures them he will torture me for all eternity for daring to everyquestion them about their Godlike power to know they are morally infallible... for their Catholicism tells them so!

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,