Skip to main content

The Infinite Absurdity of Defining "God"

According to astronomers, there are approximately 200 billion trillion stars in our observable universe. And that's just the observable universe, which is likely just a fraction of the universe as a whole. Astronomers estimate there are about 100 thousand million stars in the Milky Way alone.

Of those stars, how many possible planets, both Earth-like and other, could there possibly be? 

On Earth, all life is based on organic compounds. These molecules are composed of carbon and often include other elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur.

However, scientists have long wondered if alien life might evolve based on significantly different chemistry. For example, researchers have long speculated that silicon might also serve as a backbone for biology.

 Self-sustaining chemical reactions that could support biology radically different from life as we know it might exist on many different planets using a variety of elements beyond the carbon upon which Earth's life is based, a new study finds. (https://www.space.com/alien-life-not-carbon-based-autocatalysis-common)

Regardless of whether there are other forms of life other than carbon-based life, the possibility of the different forms of life as complex as humans on other planets is mind boggling, to say the least. (Naturally, no Christian ever wonders if Jesus would have to show up in each of those forms of life, to suffer and die for their sins as much as he had to do so for the sins of humans.)

 Now imagine a convention of scientists turning into a brutal blood bath after they all begin arguing and fighting over what kinds of life might exist on any of the planets that might exist around those 200 billion trillion stars in our observable universe, and even more so over all the planets that might exist around the even more number of stars that exist outside of the observable universe.

Of course this is ridicules and absurd. Especially because the number of possible life forms that humans could imagine to exist are still far less than the infinite number of life forms that could exist but humans could never imagine to exist. 

Now try to imagine what kind of life could be neither carbon based nor non-carbon based, and indeed non material in any shape or form, and to exist outside of all concepts of time and space. Indeed, just try to imagine a space in which such a life could exist, if it exists outside of all space.  Hell, let's make it infinitely more simple than that, and just try to imagine what it's like to live in a four dimensional universe, or a five, and so on.

And so, just like the potentially infinite number of  stars could host a potentially infinite number of different life forms, from what we could imagine to even more of what would be beyond what we could imagine such life to look and be like, so any kind of a "God" that could be said to be both wholly immaterial and wholly infinite would be at least as infinite in both what we could imagine such a "God" to be like and what we would be unable to imagine such a God could be.

All of those scientists arguing and killing each other over what kinds of life could exist around all the stars in the universe is  exactly what it is like when people argue over what kind of God the word "God" is referring to, and what kind of definition of the word "God" is blasphemous to such a God.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...