Skip to main content

Religion is NOT Morality

As the theoretical physicist and Nobel laureate in Physics, Steven Wienberg pointed out, those who claim that the worst things done in the name of religion are not religion, are simply using their morality to define religion, rather than using their religion to define their morality.

As Wienberg further pointed out, those who are willing to obey God and sacrifice Isaac, only value their sacred "beliefs" more than they value humanity or even human life. Worse, they attack all those who argue we should defend humanity to the determent of worshiping any "god" or religion, as necessarily worshiping humanity itself.

It is this blind devotion to a tyrannical God, a God that not only "willed" that his own son be tortured and murdered, and all for the very same humanity He had drowned with a flood just eons before, but who had also sent His "chosen people" to commit genocide agaisnt other nations on numerous occasions, as boasted about repeatedly in the Bible.

And yet, Catholics and Christians alike insist that what they call "religion" is in fact their own "morality," even as they refuse to accept that the two are not the same thing. It is the person's "morality" that leads them to "believe" in a religion, not the other way around. Indeed, it is morality that leads atheists to reject both God and religion!

Religion does not, and indeed it can not, shape a person's morality in a way that does not necessarily see humanity as simply a means to serving God, in the very same way that Abraham saw his son Isaac as simply a human life that, if God so ordered, was worthy of being knifed to death for God.

Christians argue that "Abraham knew God would not allow him to murder his son Isaac," but if this is true, then God's "command" was simply for show, and Abraham's "obedience" was completely meaningless.

What the Christian therefore argues is not that their own brand of "religion" is from God, but that their "morality" is completely dependent upon necessarily "believing" in a story about a man named Jesus, and that if they dare to abandon such a story, they may only rush out and become serial killers and rapists, as would everyone else.

And given the way some of the more rabid Christians seem to think, they may not be wrong!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...