Skip to main content

Those who believe without seeing are blessed?

To become a Catholic priest today, one must undergo a rigorous course of philosophical study, over the course of several years. But this focus on logic and reason hides the fact that religion is not only anti-rational, but is motivated and altogether grounded in pure emotion, despite attempts by learned men to argue everywhere that this is simply untrue. 

That Jesus makes the claim that "those who believe without seeing are blessed,"  only suggests to the atheist that Christianity is unmistakably a cult, and nothing more. 

Indeed, were the very same words spoken by the likes of Jim Jones, Charles Manson, Heaven's Gate, Pol Pot, or Alistair Crowley, to bolster the legitimacy of the "blessed" message being sold by such charlatans, not a single ardent Christian would think it wise to simply "believe" such claptrap. 

But when the Christian is told they should take pride in the fact that they are "humble" for having accepted the "infallible truth" of their Christian "beliefs," without questioning or requiring any evidence to support the legitimacy of so blatant a confabulation, they only think they are being brave for having done so.

That the same Christian refuses to so blindly accept any other "truth" claims so equally devoid of supportive evidence, and routinely criticizes anyone and everyone who does so for any system of "beliefs" other than their own brand of Christianity, from political to economic, never leads the Christian to recognize, let alone willingly admit, that they are simply a hypocrite to suggest their own "beliefs" are truer than anyone else's. 

Such a willingness only proves that the claim bandied about so often by Christians, that "you must believe in something or you will believe in anything," is itself a lie designed to hide the "truth." 

And that "truth" is that once a person is conditioned by religion to believe something without sufficient evidence, and indeed without a necessary willingness to critically question the claims of their religion at least as much as they feel compelled to critically question the claims and "beliefs" of their opponents, they are willing to believe anything and everything that can be yoked to that religion, from the claim that the legitimacy of slavery is grounded in the Bible to the claim that "witches" are real because the devil is. 

"Those who believe without seeing," in other words, are only as "blessed" as those people in padded rooms and asylums around the world,  who are convinced they are covered in spiders that no one else can see, or are even Napoleon Bonaparte or Jesus Christ.      


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...