Skip to main content

How Money is a Drug

The internet and virtual reality technology, indeed even drugs, are not the first things we created that allowed us to live in a "virtual world," far removed from reality and all of the suffering and hardships it contains. The first devices humans ever created that allowed people to escape into such a virtual reality was religion, and then money. Money, in other words, provides the wealthiest of all with the miracle of living in heaven on earth, even when doing so requires putting everyone else in hell. 

Money, as such, allows us to purchase an escape from the real world, and the worst that life has to offer. Hence, money does to reality itself what drugs do to our mind. Where heroin hides from us the hell we have fallen into in the real world, by hoking us on our euphoria, money pays to insulate a person from how much the world is going to hell around them, and affords the richest of all the luxury to deny that they are the ones responsible for sending it there. 

The wealthiest live on their own “fantasy island” in their heads, in this sense, which rests in reality on the broken backs of all those who must suffer to maintain the pretense that money allows us to buy. "The comforts of the rich," as Voltaire put it, "depend upon an abundant supply of the poor." To the rich, those poor are worth less than mere livestock, beasts of burden, which is why the former pass laws designed to sweep the poorest of all off of the streets, while making money in the process.

Wealth is an estate of the mind, and the more wealth one has, which gives them a right to enjoy a larger portion of the resources over everyone else (thanks  only to the laws they drafted and the religions they created to justify so inequitable an arrangement), the further they can insulate themselves from the suffering their accumulation of wealth necessarily rises in tandem with. And it rises in tandem with that suffering necessarily, because it is the cause of it.

This then, is the true "intelligent design" of our, and all, economic religions.

It’s interesting how often we think we are better or smarter than others, simply because they don’t see things the same way we do.   Without money, there would be no way to affirm or "reward" one way of thinking over another. And nothing convinces us that we must indeed be "smarter" than others, than how much money we have. 

Money validates the “right” way of thinking in a given society, enriching people to the degree they agree with and work to propagate that system as right, benevolent and virtuous, even if such people are quite critical of that system sometimes along the way.  No institution rewards those who dare to question the power or authority or benevolence of that institution. But all those who glorify, fight and defend that system, or who's opposition to it can later be refashioned as support of it, are hailed as its saints. That's why Jesus is now the prophet as much of the Catholic Church as the profit making money changers, and why we celebrate Martin Luther King's birthday in a country engaged in a race war using the pretext of a War on Drugs.  

Capitalism simply rewards those who defend its secrets and its lies, while at the same time singing its praises, and money is simply the reward, given to us like Pavlov giving food to his dog, of how much the "system" approves of our thinking, obedience, and behavior. This approval is then sold to that person as simply being "God's" approval, which is how religions for every empire have always been used to yoke a person's spirituality and fear of death, to the powers that be.

Those powers change only in their methods, names, and configurations, while their desire to rule over others remains always the same. And money is the greatest means they have of doing so, and hiding the latter by always changing the former.

Money, in other words, turns reality itself into a chameleon, allowing us to live in whatever version of "virtual reality" that we can afford, while always hiding from us the ever present lust for power, in an every growing array of guises. 


  






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...