Skip to main content

for the love of dog

When I say I "found God," I mean to say I found the closest thing on Earth that any human being can even begin to compare to a God of "love." That "God" is utter love, devoid of all judgement or criticism, and sees only the purest essence of a person, what a "theist" might refer to as a "soul." That "God" is captured in perhaps no living thing better than a dog.

I have always been struck by the nature with which a dog loves its owner, or even people in general, without the slightest care of their religious beliefs, political ideology, nationality or race, gender, sexual orientation, age, height, weight, you name it! And yet, from the most rabid of believers to those who use their "beliefs" to make their decisions for them, people convince themselves (with a great deal of help from one church or another) that the "love of God" is not necessarily and always like the love of a dog; a conclusion I flatly reject.

Instead, religions everywhere promote the idea that, while God's love is said to be "unconditional," one's "heavenly reward" is not only not guaranteed to anyone, but is also predicated on a good deal of prerequisites. 

Imagine if in fact the God all religions worshiped was more like the love of a dog, however, one devoid of all judgement other than whether you loved that dog in return - and nothing more. In fact, we see just such an idea for God spelled out clearly in the Beatitudes. How much more peaceful and uncomplicated might religion, and indeed the world overall, be today, if our Gods were more like our dogs?

When you think about it, dogs, like children, love without any qualification. It is only adults who then impose upon that love nationalism, politics, patriotism, religions, race, and all the rest. We do not mature when we get older, at least with regards to love, we devolve instead, and use our ideas to convince us otherwise with one theology about god , country, or economics, or another.

If there is one religion I could wholeheartedly embrace, it would be one that preaches of a God that has the capacity to love with all the innocence of a dog. Any other "God" is simply the tool manufactured by man to make money by controlling others. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...