Skip to main content

from many to one, and one to many

It is interesting to note how the evolution of human understanding about God has run in the opposite direction of the evolution of the human understanding about humanity. While religion has moved in the direction of divine unification, from polytheism to monotheism over the course of millenniums, science has largely moved in the direction of human diversification, from the human race to categories of different races, over the course of mere centuries. 

The paganism and polytheism of the ancient religions saw all the forces of nature as each constituting a god. This eventually gave way to henotheism, where one god reigned supreme over all the others, as we saw with Greece and Rome, eventually giving way to the monotheism of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

Our conception of space and time have followed our understanding of the cosmos as well.  First we assumed that Earth was the center of the universe, only to discover that the Sun was the center of our solar system. Then we thought that Earth was more amazing than all the other planets, only to discover the opposite was true. So we assured ourselves that the Sun was the most amazing star in the galaxy, only to discover it is but an average star. We then assured ourselves there was only a single galaxy, only to discover there are billions of them. And we finally decided there is but one universe, only to discover that we may well live in a multiverse.

And this leads us to wonder: what if the contraction in our mind about God being singular, was just as much a mistake as our ideas about our earth and our cosmos?

During much of this time, humans had hardly considered whether humanity was cut from anything other than a single seamless genetic cloth, much like the one that was said to belong to Christ, for which the soldiers threw dice at the foot of the cross upon which he hung.

That image of Jesus hanging on the cross, while the soldiers threw dice to divide up his "seamless garment," is an appropriate one here.

Like those soldiers who had helped to crucify Christ, so the scientists who have advanced ideas of racial differences over the centuries - even though the mapping of the human genome has demonstrated that there is, and has always only ever been, one single human race - have likewise only helped to crucify countless millions around the world, from Bengalis under the British Raj, to Chinese under the British opium trade, to Africans and Native Americans and countless others, and all of it buttressed by Christianity (i.e. a "belief" of spiritual superiority) that operated under the delusion of a "belief" of racial superiority.  And of course, the two only served to mutually reinforce each other.

Talk about ironic.

And as humans unified God, they diversified each other. Yet both ideas about god and race, are pure religions, and nothing more. In this respect, wealthy white Christian empires have long used the biological religion of race to crucify all other "races" in the name of Christ, and in pursuit of the Christian ideal of what they alone decided it means to be a human being.

Amen. 
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...