Skip to main content

Christianity: Worshipping Perpetual Childhood

Peter Pan is a story about a child that never wants to grow up. In J. D. Salinger’s book, The Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield is suffering from a similar problem. And both are simply exhibiting what it is to be a Christian – stuck in a permanent state of childhood. The Catholic Church denies this is true, of course, because it could never sell its snake oil if ever it told those it was selling such snake oil that it was pure snake oil. But we can see the contradiction plainly enough if we are willing to “put the ways of childhood behind” us and think like men. In one of his more well-known passages of Scripture about spiritual maturity, St Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 13:11, “When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.” The problem is that Christianity, by requiring a dependence upon a Church and a Bible and a belief in a “God” father, thus requires its faithful flock to talk, think, and reason, not like a man or an adult, but like a child or a slave. As children, we rely on our parents to guide us and teach us how to determine what things might be bad for us (like taking drugs) and what things might be good for us (like learning to think for yourself). But religion flips this script. Christianity offers its followers the spiritual drugs of its sacraments. And even if those sacraments are placebos, they nevertheless convince the “believer” that they are cured of their fallible nature, and are therefore spiritually improved, by such sacramental vaccines. Thinking for yourself, on the other hand, is a strict no-no. That is the greatest sin of all, in fact. As a “believer” in God, one must always make sure that the Father “who art in Heaven” do all of their thinking for them. The job of the “believer” is to ONLY ever “believe,” and not to question. The “believer” must only think about why they should, and indeed why they must, “believe” that God (i.e., the Catholic Church) should be trusted to do their thinking for them. This is like a bird that never trusts it has learned how to fly straight, so that it feels the need to have a priestly class of birds that correct its errors of flight its while life. it is the difference between learning how to swim in the ocean and thinking that we must learn instead how to only hold onto a buoy for dear life lest we drown or be consumed by sharks. To be a champion swimmer in the seas of thought one must know how to think, which is impossible to do when one is clinging to the buoy of one brand of belief or another. And who speaks for this God who we are to rely on like a father figure to do all of our thinking for us, a god who seems to have stopped speaking for himself 2000 years ago? The Catholic priests who claim they alone have the ability to know God’s will. In this way, the Christian is taught not to learn how to swim and think for themselves, which is a privilege limited to the priestly class that alone has been give the power and the right to do that, but to cling to the buoy of the beliefs they were taught as children, and thus remain like a child, waiting for various “fathers” in the form of priests, and “mothers” in the form of nuns, to tell them what to do and how to think so as to please God enough so that said God will NOT throw them into a lake of fire for all eternity for the sin of being man enough to think for yourself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...