Point out to my brother that his “belief” that Catholicism is “infallibly” true is simply a “belief” that could be false, and he will reflexively tell you that your “belief” that his belief is just a belief that could be false is, in fact, also just your belief that could likewise be false. This is untrue, of course, but he doesn't care about that. A "belief" by its very nature may be true or may be false. Recognizing this is not a "belief," it is a demonstrable basis of logic. It is like him claiming that his “belief” that 2 + 2 = 5 is no different than my “belief” that 2 + 2 does not equal 5, it equals 4. It is not simply my "belief" that his math is wrong, it is a demonstrable basis of mathamatics. In this way, his belief convinces him that he is infallible, because what he believes in (the Catholic Church) is infallible, and therefore his “beliefs” can never be wrong, and are always superior to any other "belief," especially those grounded in logic or evidence. And if you say “I don’t believe you or your Catholic Church are as infallible as you and your Catholic Church like to pretend you both are,” he will again tell you “but that is just your belief.” Have this conversation with him enough times and you come to the infallible religious belief that he just likes being an asshole for his brand of pure rhetoric, which he “believes” is reason, and not just hot air.
If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...
Comments
Post a Comment