Skip to main content

We Are What We Call Ourselves

It is simply a miracle of denial that Christians claim secular culture is robbing children of their innocence, since it is the Christian "belief" that children are born sinners that actualy does this. Naturally, Christians deny this is true, becaue they cannot stand the thought that they are guilty of accusing their own children of being disobedient murders (like Adam and Eve, and of killing Christ via their "sins"). Ironically, it is because Christians claim to be born sinners in need of a savior that they actually "believe" they are spiritually better than everyone else who thinks otherwise. Like denying that they rob children of their innocence by simply assuming they are all stained with original sin, so the Christian likewise denies that they think they are better than everyone else simply becaue they believe they are sinners who have been saved by the bloody execution of Jesus. If they do not think they are "improved" by believing this, and will win an infinite better life after they die for doing so, then what is there incentive for so believing? (Good luck getting a straight answer to that.) Call a man a pig and you will bring out the pig in the man. This was one of the warnings given to protestors during the 1960s demonstrations, telling them not to call cops "pigs" becaue it would only lead those cops to act like, well, what they are being called. It is also the morale of the story of the ugly duckling. Recall that the ugly duckling told itself it was a duck, even though in truth it was a swan. So too, Christianity requires that humanity tell itself it is a born sinner, and insists that this is the ONLY way to ever prevent man from sinning. This is like telling a child they must first believe they are a stupid moron before they could ever believe they are smart enough to learn anything. Tell the child they are brilliant and good to begin with, and only then will they be able to be brilliant and good. Christianty rejects ever telling people they are good and innocent to begin with, robbing children of their true innocence from the moment of birth, and all so those children will become addicted to the crack of Christianity, which only makes people into the "sinners" it requires them to believe they are born as.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...