Skip to main content

Questions for Atheists


I wanted to go to an atheist meeting to see if atheists do the same things with their atheism that Christians do with their Christianity.

I assume that they wouldn't, but if they did, I assume atheists would at least do it less often than Christians.  And I would think this, because that's exactly what I thought about Christians when I was a Christian.

And I keep that in mind,  because I just don't want to end up getting checkmated by my own mind. 

But telling this to the group may actually prejudice that group agaisnt me for having said it, which is so often exactly what most Christians do, and they do that, just as much as they deny that that is exactly what they are doing.

I wish I could be more trustful of people's ability to reason their way out of the labyrinths of lies we create,  whose bowels form the environment which in turn creates all of us. We are made in the image and likeness, in other words, of all of those lies.

And I am suspicious of those who claim to have essentially found their way out, which is exactly what all religions claim in some respect, even though all religions have equally vested interests (i.e. power) in only ever building the walls of that labyrinth higher and higher, while swearing to God they are the only ones who are capable of knocking those walls down.

In that sense, I was just wondering if atheists should believe there is 'No God' as vehemently as monotheists believe there is a 'God." Or if all those who believe there is a God, could be just as controlled through a faith in atheism as they are by a faith in monotheism, and by the very same people who are doing it today. Or if we should simply alter or even do away with such a word altogether as being objectively meaningless.

Or should we just think of “god” as whatever forces got us here, however unintelligent and unintelligible they may be, which Christians happen to believe thinks and acts just like they do, which is why they are always so certain they know what “God” is thinking.

 



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...