Skip to main content

David in the Garden: Gilboa to Golgotha

The Bible is basically a bunch of metaphors, wrapped in a single story, that it repeats in different ways. Adam is Moses is Jesus, and the Serpent is King David and Barabbas.   In this sense, just as any one of the stories can be seen to be the recasting of all the others, so those stories can be applied to any time throughout history, and even our own.

Capitalism, for example, is basically both the serpent in the garden of Eden, and the apple. Eden, of course, is the world we live in, while the serpent is represented by priests, politicians and advertisers, and the "apple" is our comforts, toys, and technologies. And for evermore of the latter, we are destroying our Eden, and each other.  

That's why the thing you have in your hand is probably an "apple" iPhone, and the internet is a "tree of knowledge." It's also why religious people act like they've been hypnotized to believe that they are "like God, knowing good from evil." And why that "knowledge of good and evil" is exactly what the serpent in the Tree of Knowledge promised they would have, if they basically "ate of the fruit of the vine," which used to be the apple or "forbidden fruit" but now they call Jesus.

Christians naturally argue that Jesus, rather than being the poisoned apple that spoiled humanity forever, was, and is, the antidote to it, and to the lie of the serpent, as well as the sin of Adam and Eve. Perhaps a better interpretation is, if one considers the Old Testament to be a polemic by the Northern Tribes agaisnt David's attempts to usurp power by declaring a divinely desired monarchy, that Jesus had come to undo the sin of David who, like a serpent, used ideas of God to get what he wanted, and like Barabbas, was willing to kill anyone who stood in his way.

Hence, the destruction of the "Temple" at Golgotha brought down the one that began with the defeat of Israel at Gilboa.

And, since David was a Jebusite, the fact that Israel "rose again with incredible speed and within a few years had become the foremost nation of Palestine and Syria," should be interpreted as the Philistines knowing that David would Paganize the Jews, rather than that God was showing favor upon him. And the temple he wanted built is exhibit A.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...