Skip to main content

The Magna Carta of Christ: The Council of Trent, Tradition, and Pedophiles

The Council of Trent, which was held between "1545 and 1563 in Trento (Trent), northern Italy, was an ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic Church. Prompted by the Protestant Reformation, it has been described as the embodiment of the Counter-Reformation."

Some have described this not as a "Counter-Reformation," but a Catholic Reformation. But by either name, the point is that the Reformation prompted the Catholic Church to reconsider, or at least more clearly define, some of its ideas and decrees. 

For the first time, for example, the Church was forced to grapple with the question of "justification." Were we saved by "faith alone," as Luther argued, or by "faith through works"?  At Trent, the Catholic Church decides that we are justified by "faith working in love."

That the larger object of the "work" being done in love through faith may be an ultimate act of evil - such as soldiers fighting in one bogus war after another, from Crusades to World Wars, or Christian missions helping Columbus slaughter Native Americans with the alchemy of sowing God and reaping gold - is irrelevant to the individual, of course. 

And this is because the individual is too limited in their ability to understand the "mysterious ways of God" (or their governments, especially their Church), and so must content themselves with the idea that they are doing good, at least in their own mind, even if some more powerful person is using that good for evil purposes. In fact, this idea pretty much sums up the entire argument about the Viet Nam War. 

Aside from this, however, the Council of Trent established the idea that Tradition, with a capital "T," while not being on par with the authority of the Bible itself, is nevertheless as important as anything else in correctly "interpreting" the Bible messages. The cornerstone upon which such an idea necessarily rests, of course, is that people must therefore depend upon, and place their complete trust in, the Church's ability to not only decipher the Bible correctly using Tradition, but always use and apply that "interpretation" in ways that serve only God, not necessarily itself. 

In other words, the Church must be willing to, like Christ himself, sacrifice itself for the sake of the "truth" it derives from scripture using that tradition. Only it has NEVER done so. Instead, the Church has only ever equated it's interpretations with Scripture as necessarily serving it's own survival first - which is no different from what any trade union, corporation, or government has ever done - and only secondarily on how it serves the people. And it always serves the people, much like the Sanhedrin had done with its own interpretations of the Torah, by making those people only every more dependent upon the Church itself. 

This is why Christ's teaching that "the law was made to serve man, not man to serve the law," which so threatened this habit the Sanhedrin had of always giving interpretations that only forced their flock to depend every more upon their intercession, was seen as such a threat. And it was seen as such as threat because it served as a kind of "magna carta," suggesting that the Sanhedrin derived its power from the governed, even as it pretended to draw it's power from God. 

For in the same way that King Sol and his son David, usurped power unto themselves from the 12 tribes of Israel, so to the Sanhedrin had vested itself with the same 'divine authority' to rule over the descendants of those tribes. 

And like King David and the Sanhedrin, the Catholic Church used that power to not only commit it's atrocities agaisnt all those it deemed "enemies" and heretics of society,  that Catholics all dismiss as just being nothing more than a sign of the times (proving once again that the Church is NOT guided by a "god" but by humans acting like god), but to hide its own criminals who preyed upon the children of those who accepted the belief that their Church was, despite its human failing, always being guided by a 'god.'

And by so doing, the Church, like the boy who cried wolf, forever forfeited it's right  to claim it has any authority to declare itself the moral compass of God (unless their "god" is Satan). 

    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...

How Capitalism Is About Killing the Poor

Capitalism is a religion. That's all it is. It is thought of as simply a way of organizing and running your economy, but it can only ever end up killing the "unchosen."And the "chosen" are the ones who were given great wealth, by God, or course. And they, like Abraham, are only too happy to sacrifice a world of Isaacs, if that is what their God of money commands. Look at the EpiPen ad AIDS medication controversy, when Mylan raised the price over 500% and Martin Shkreli jacked up the prices of AIDS meds, just because they could, not because they needed to make bigger profits. And look at the 70 fold price increase on a drug treatment for Muscular Dystrophy, charging $89,000.00 per year. For Spinal Muscular atrophy, they charge $750,000 for first year and $300K thereafter. In this way, capitalism sells long life the way the Catholic Church once sold salvation through indulgences. Both are highly respected and adored by the other, despite Jesus overturning the ...

The Clash of Religious Beliefs with Reality: Over Simplicity in a Hyper Complex World

God is the anthropomorphism of  our hope that life has a "happily ever after" ending, where there is no such thing as death and suffering, which we anthropomorphize in the form of the devil. In a sense, we are taking ideas and turning them into phantom figures of our selves, with angles and demons being projections of our own souls and our penchant for good and evil.  We see this when we anthropomorphize the act of gift giving into Santa Clause and think in terms of "old man winter" and "father time." We even reverse this process by describing ourselves as living in the springtime of our youth or the autumn of our years.  Religion takes this habit to another level, however, and teaches people to "believe" that the personifications we rely on to describe our hopes and fears are actual "beings;" beings from whom all of the characteristics we tend to associate with ideas of life and death, good and evil, necessarily emanate. Thi...