Skip to main content

The Voice in Our Head

Julian Jaynes "speculates that until late in the second millennium B.C. men had no consciousness but were automatically obeying the voices of gods."

But that would depend on how we define the word "gods."

If by "gods," we mean Jupiter, Zeus, Allah or Yahweh, as "beings" that are actually entirely separate beings from ourselves, then we would still have to question if we have anyway of determining the difference between that, and "gods" we only think of in those terms, that are simply the product of own ideas alone.

And we would have to separate both of these from those other "identities" that we are equally as addicted to as God, be they our politics, nationality, ethnicity, and so on.

This thought leaves us to wonder, however, if the kind of consciousness we experience today is an altogether different kind of consciousness from what previous generations have experienced. Not simply because of our technology, which no doubt contributes in quite significant ways, but that we have categories that were wholly unavailable to previous generations, like "homosexual" and "heterosexual" or even the id, the ego and the superego, to say nothing of the higgs boson, the mulitverse, cosmological pluralism, or m-brane theory. 

How much control do our ideas have over our own mind? How much do those ideas control what we think more than we do? And how do we determine the difference ? Or can we?

"Bueller?...  Bueller?...  Bueller?.."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...