Skip to main content

Propaganda: Following the Leader

 When the double nephew of Sigmund Freud , Edward Bernays, said that people must be manipulated in their thinking from above, which is how the Creel Commission convinced Americans to hate Germans as much in 1914 as many Americans hate Muslims today, he was simply articulating the very same thinking held by Catholics and Muslims for thousands of years.

The only difference, of course, is that Catholics and Muslims think people should have their thinking manipulated by a God above, and his holy "church"  (who's laws, they argue, are all clearly written down in the bloodiest book humanity has ever written, let alone venerated, even though none of them agree on what it says), while Bernays was essentially saying that if it is acceptable to people that their minds should be manipulable by God, then they should consent to having it similarly manipulated by Government, since governments are simply the latest fashionable forms of monarchies. And both monarchies and authoritative governments have  always been defended by Popes as deriving their power directly from God, much like the Popes themselves.

And yet those who work to spread the message of their church deny that they are engaging in the very same kind of "propaganda" they everywhere suspect of their governments, even though the latter is simply following the leader. 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...