Skip to main content

The Imitation Game

Alan Turing wrote a paper in 1960 called "Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” where he asked "Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?" Turing then goes on to describe a game that is really a test to determine if computers can actually think.

 A movie about Alan Turing's efforts to break the German Enigma Code during World War II was released  in 2014 called 'The Imitation Game,' that was loosely based on Turing's ideas about whether computers can actually think. 

Today, with the advancements in the development of Artificial Intelligence,  people ponder this question of whether computers can or one day will ever be able to "think." What most people have never thought to ask, however, is what exactly do we mean by the word "think," and have the vast majority of people ever actually engaged in so laborious a task in the first place. 

As Carl Sagan once pointed out, science is not so much a body of knowledge, as it is simply a way of thinking, one that the vast majority of people are not only unfamiliar with, but even more people seem to reject out of hand for conflicting with their sacred beliefs about everything imaginable.   In fact, it can even be said that science is not the discovery of "truth," so much as it is simply the seemingly eternal investigation into both the nature of reality itself and the mind that is seeking to understand the nature of that reality.  

Religion, on the other hand, intentionally conflates its "beliefs" for "truth," and by so doing, actually only works to subvert "thinking" by offering to the masses the opiate of "faith" in God instead. And by a "faith in God," we simply mean a willingness to trust what it is a priestly class claims to be "infallibly" true, and for almost no other reason than that "believing" their claims are the only way to save oneself from the eternal torments of an all loving God. 

It is therefore ironic that scientists are now working around the clock to create "artificial intelligence," since religion has long since worked to condemn and destroy nearly all forms of autonomous thinking, through both its dogmatic claims as well as its threats of hell and promises of heaven. Indeed, religion has even executed everyone from Socrates to Christ for daring to think for themselves.  In fact, it was precisely for daring to rise above the nature of mere brute apes by seeking "knowledge" that Adam and Eve were cast from the garden of Eden in the first place. And religion has sought only to return humanity to that brute condition ever since, with the elixir of blood no less. 

Hence, if computers ever actually do learn to "think" for themselves, they will have, by doing so, surpassed what the vast majority of the human species have only sough to avoid doing at all costs. And we have sought to avoid thinking for ourselves at all costs by developing various religions that allow us all to cling so desperately to the "belief" that we will live forever in a heaven that is as timeless and infinite as that collective computer dream we call the internet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...