Skip to main content

Jesus Came to Redeem Humanity for the Sins of David, Not Adam

Anyone who has bothered to read anything about the Tribes of Israel knows that Jesus did NOT come to redeem humanity for the sin of Adam, per se, but the sin of David.

Adam, like Lucifer, wanted to "be like God," so the Christian will tell you. But David, by setting himself up as the King of the Jews (and then later rewriting this fact), was always understood by the early Jews to be the thing that ultimately broke the covenant that the Jews had with their God.

The Catholic Church has only ever hidden this fact from their congregation, because to admit that Christ came to destroy the man made temples that David had built (via his son), which included the institutional temples that included the Sanhedrin and those power structures that were no less about power, and no less corrupt, as the Catholic Church, and every other "religious" institution today, was to put itself in the very same position that the Sanhedrin was in when Christ began to point this out.

That, of course, is why the Sanhedrin murdered Christ. They murdered him, because he was no different than Gandhi, or Martin Luther King, or so many others, who have all stood up to the evil of power. This is why Paul Tillich called "all institutions inherently demonic," even as Catholics insist their own is better than the rest, which is what everyone thinks about their favorite institution.

The story of Adam, then, like the story of Lucifer, are simply different renditions of the sin of David, in his desire to seize a throne of a people who, as part of their covenant with their God, knew they could have "no other Gods before" their own. To appoint a king was to do just that, as the emperors and rulers of those days were always understood to be "gods," of one sort or another.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...