Skip to main content

Jesus Came to Redeem Humanity for the Sins of David, Not Adam

Anyone who has bothered to read anything about the Tribes of Israel knows that Jesus did NOT come to redeem humanity for the sin of Adam, per se, but the sin of David.

Adam, like Lucifer, wanted to "be like God," so the Christian will tell you. But David, by setting himself up as the King of the Jews (and then later rewriting this fact), was always understood by the early Jews to be the thing that ultimately broke the covenant that the Jews had with their God.

The Catholic Church has only ever hidden this fact from their congregation, because to admit that Christ came to destroy the man made temples that David had built (via his son), which included the institutional temples that included the Sanhedrin and those power structures that were no less about power, and no less corrupt, as the Catholic Church, and every other "religious" institution today, was to put itself in the very same position that the Sanhedrin was in when Christ began to point this out.

That, of course, is why the Sanhedrin murdered Christ. They murdered him, because he was no different than Gandhi, or Martin Luther King, or so many others, who have all stood up to the evil of power. This is why Paul Tillich called "all institutions inherently demonic," even as Catholics insist their own is better than the rest, which is what everyone thinks about their favorite institution.

The story of Adam, then, like the story of Lucifer, are simply different renditions of the sin of David, in his desire to seize a throne of a people who, as part of their covenant with their God, knew they could have "no other Gods before" their own. To appoint a king was to do just that, as the emperors and rulers of those days were always understood to be "gods," of one sort or another.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...