Skip to main content

Possessed by God

People who believe in God are possessed by demons. Those demons are very often their own, of course. In fact, those who fear themselves the most are the ones who also judge others the most. And they are also the one's who, like an inveterate gambler or a hopeless drug addict, will  not only vehemently deny they are incurably addicted to their "beliefs," but will very often respond to such an accusation in typically one of three ways.

The first way is to play the victim, asking "why are you attacking my faith?" This question plays innocent, as if a person's desire to simply "believe" whatever it is they want is a perfectly harmless thing, even though believing things on flimsy to no evidence at all has been used to support bogus wars, every genocide of the 20th century (in one way or another), and can even be traced all the way back to Adam & Eve choosing to simply "believe" the serpent, despite no evidence to support his claim that they would "become like God" if they ate of the forbidden fruit.

So when the Christian says, "why are you attacking my faith?" the answer is quite simply because their faith is an attack on reason itself. More than this, in fact, it is from this "faith" that the Christian derives all of their supposed "divine" authority to pretend they hold moral superiority in everything from war to marriage, and from sex to the origins of the universe itself. And they do all of this, of course, with all of the conviction of a lunatic who is quite sure they are Napoleon Bonaparte. Or to put it another way, the majority of people who claim to believe in God, are quite simply suffering from a god-complex, since they are quite sure that their own ideas about everything under the sun, are always perfectly aligned with the "God" they have in mind.

Indeed, that is why their "God" just happens to hate all of the same people that they do, and for all of the very same reasons.It also illustrates how easy it is for the victimizer to hide their victimization of others by always claiming to be the victim. Examples include Christians who  supported witch burning and later lynchings, who likewise tended to oppose the abolition of slavery (because slavery is sanctioned in the Bible, they argued), Conservatives who opposed Civil Rights, and all those who opposed interracial and now same sex marriage.  

The second way Christians respond to any criticism of their sacred "beliefs" is to claim that people must necessarily believe in something, lest they believe in anything, and they must believe in God, lest they have no reason to be moral at all. Both of these claims are patently false.

First, it is the fact that people are trained to simply accept the "belief" in their God, and thus their religion and their church and their priests, that conditions their mind to believe in all sorts of things without evidence, and all because it makes them "feel" go to simply believe it (even as they only ever insist that their "faith" is not simply a "feeling").

God, in this respect, is simply a gateway drug, that hooks the user on the endorphin buzz that comes from "believing" in "love," which of course is God. Religion then conditions the user to identify this ecstasy of belief, as "proof" in and of itself, that the "belief" must be real, even as the "priests" who convince people of this lie directly deny this fact, by insisting that such a feeling is not simply the result of their own endorphins, but actually caused by an outside stimulate called the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit, in this respect, is a spiritual heroin addiction, that is everywhere applauded by other uses as not only the greatest virtue of all, but as the only drug capable of keeping people from becoming raving rapists and serial killers.

God is not only heroin, in other words, but thorazine as well.

Second, the claim that people would have no reason to be moral if they don't believe in God is really just an admission by Christians that, but for their belief or love (i.e. fear) of God, they'd likely give into all of their worst desires. (This is possible with God, of course, as any historical survey of Christianity readily reveals. It's just that all of the raping and killing needs to be carried out the way it was in the Old Testament is all.)

 After all, it is not like most people in a given society are law abiding simply because that society has plenty of laws. In fact, the Conservatives in America are quite right to argue the very opposite in their politics, even as they suggest such a thing is indispensable to their religion!

 Anthropology is filled with examples of tribes and ancient people's who had no laws, however, and yet such peoples were not all raving rapists, thieves, and serial killers, as the Christian who demands that morality needs God would have the world believe. But the Christian simply chooses to ignore the mountain of evidence that undermines their claim, preferring instead to simply "believe" the priest or pastor who continues to peddle this lie, with all of the believably of a serpent selling forbidden fruit.  

And third, many of the greatest evils were only possible because people had simply chosen to "believe" in any number of lies, as if it were their religion. Racism, slavery, Communism, and plenty of other examples, all happened either directly with the support of Christianity, or because religion had succeeded in conditioning people to simply accepting the idea that their "belief" was the same thing as "truth," while convincing them that questioning such "truth" amounted to heresy. (How ironic is it that the Christian who is called to be like Christ, refuses to question their Christianity for fear of being accused of being a heretic, like Christ.)

But even an atheist can read the story of Adam & Eve and see clearly that the problem was their willingness to simply "believe" what the serpent told them, and all because they wanted to be like God - which is the exact same thing Christianity says people must strive to be, in order to qualify for God's gracious admission into his Heavenly kingdom.

No wonder the miters worn by Pope's and Bishops resemble the head of a King Cobra.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...