Skip to main content

The Monstrosity of Man

At some point in history, human beings did not exist. And then, all of a sudden, from out of the various forms of life that had preceded him, he did. For the Christian, this was an act of god, while for the biologist, it was an act of nature. Yet in either case, it was the moment that history culled together the ingredients that, until that point, had never been mashed together in so unique a composite of clay and consciousness as it had in what would come to be called the dawn of "man."

Unlike anything that had come before, man would emerge as much of a monster to some species, including his own, as a monarch to others; as much as a host of angels and an army of demons; as much as a lone deity with a divine intelligence, as the demonic ignorance of the devil himself.

If man indeed evolved from a common ancestor, the first offspring was no doubt considered to be, not a more intelligent, more evolved, more enlightened being, blessed with a divine soul and grasp of reality, but as much an abominable aberration of nature as Frankenstein's monster. 

The modern human, when first born into this world, was no doubt seen by all others with all of the fear and contempt that Christians see atheists and homosexuals, and that Native Americans and Africans would eventually come to see Europeans, after the latter had out Heroded "Herod the Great," in their wholesale massacre of the innocent former; and had done so while promising those they massacred, the same "God"  the serpent had used to destroy Eden with promises to Adam & Eve. 

Christians came to the new world promising Christ to all those they felt it was their duty to crucify in the name of their holy God. And they forgave themselves their evils by preaching forgiveness to those who's Eden they stole and who, through the brutality of a biblically justified slavery, were turned into unwilling accomplices in its destruction.   


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...