Skip to main content

The Heartbeat of History



Human history has a heartbeat.   

It has a rhythmic pulse that is both systolic and diastolic, as it contracts when power concentrates in the hands of the few, and expands as that power is eventually disseminated back among the many. 

The contest for the single human soul shared equally by every human being, then, has only ever been waged between these two forces, between those few who seek the power to control the many, and always with claims of necessity, benevolence, and divine right, and the many who have repeatedly challenged those who have always enriched themselves by convincing the many to accept the legitimacy of such claims, in either religious or political terms.

For most of that history, religion has largely been used as a means of concentrating power in the hands of the few to control the many, not only by offering and then legitimizing hierarchically ordered paradigms, but by working everywhere to convince people that those paradigms reflect both a divine universal reality, and the divine will of God himself. And yet both of these paradigms are not only false idols, but are entirely man made. The three major religions today, in other words, which all claim to worship a God, are actually religions that only worship man, and nothing else.  

The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, as Edward Gibbons pointed out, "were all considered by the people, as equally true; by the philosopher, as equally false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful." And they were equally useful, because they convinced people that their obedience to authority was tantamount to serving the will of God. What is ironic about this, with the story of Jesus and so many other such "man-gods," is that they all, in one way or another, illustrate just how much that paradigm is one of the biggest lies in human history. 

From the concentration of the "gods" of paganism and polytheism into monotheism, and from disparate oral traditions that not only evolved organically with the times as "the living word," but were designed to be applied dynamically in an evolving world, to sacred written texts that could only be interpreted by a professional priestly class that claimed to have divine understanding, the slow process by which humanity has increasingly surrendered its freedom and liberty in exchange for security and narrative, traces its roots back to the Pharaohs of Egypt. 

Like the Hebrews who sought to escape that bondage, however, humanity has willingly sold itself into one form of enslavement or another, whether religious, political, or financial, and always under the belief that we were only ever doing God's will in the process, and achieving an ever greater freedom as a result.  Such are lies, then, that they always promise the very opposite of what they deliver, so they can always blame those who refuse to "believe" the lie, of being responsible for why it has not come true. 

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...