Skip to main content

The Comforts of the Rich & Powerful

The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.

 -Voltaire- 


It is said that many (maybe all) serial killers, typically start by killing animals, before they move on to begin killing people. It should be no surprise, then, that in this same way, Lords and monarchs alike, enjoy hunting as much as they do. 

Humans are the only creature that claims to believe in a God, someone once wrote, and the only one that acts as if they haven't got one. This contradiction can be seen in no better place than our attitude toward murder. 

In the book of Exodus, for example, we see how Moses - by being as obedient to God as Abraham - is relieved of any responsibility for the savage murders he directs his followers to commit. After receiving the Ten Commandments, Moses comes down from Mount Sinai and sees that his people had built for themselves a Golden Calf. Angered, he breaks the tablets (a fine way to treat holy writ) and proclaims, “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: ‘Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor.’” 

In other words, right after God gave Moses the commandment “thou shalt not kill,” God commanded Moses to act like Charles Manson and tell his followers to “kill them all!” Ignoring the obvious contradiction, Moses obeyed, blood was spilled, and a God who would force his people to wander around in the desert for forty years was avenged for the insult to his vanity.     

Humans also have the ability to denounce murder as both an immoral evil and a sport, a sin agaisnt God and an obligation to a monarch. And they do this without even a hint that they are being completely "relative" by choosing when and where, or even for whom it is, that any such "murder" is committed. 

And this is precisely the nature of power, that it alone has the authority to "be like God," and to determine when murder is right from when it is wrong. For a King is everywhere celebrated for doing with an armada, as St. Augustine pointed out in the City of God, what the pirate is condemned for doing with a single ship.  For like God himself, who is loved by the world despite having murdered it once already (along with the impending threat included in the book of Revelations of doing it, or at least allowing it to be done, yet again), so the sovereign can do no wrong.

This is why David's ascension to the throne was the sin of Adam & Eve. It is also why war is more like hunting pheasants or foxes for the rich and powerful, than it is for those killing and dying in them. And why the comforts of the rich, as Voltaire said, depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma...
  The world changes according to the way people see it, and if you alter even by a millimeter the way people look at reality, then you can change it.” James Baldwin   

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...