There is no greater curiosity than that of a child. And just as great as that curiosity is the creative process of understanding and assimilating information. God has so designed the human brain and nervous system that it needs to ask why as much as a tree needs water. And in answering that question, which it can in an infinite number of ways, it equally has the ability to design unique answers unto itself! And only our ability to ask and answer such questions is what makes us so unique. In fact, as much as a child needs love to thrive, which they need as much as sleep and water, a child loves to learn by asking why, and just as creatively imagining the answers. Doing so only becomes a major problem when such a child insists their own answers are infallible, and everyone else must be crucified and burned for all eternity for daring to say otherwise. But then comes the problem - why? Christianity teaches parents, via spiritual surrogate parents in the roles of priests and nuns, that
"The essence of humanity's spiritual dilemma," wrote Edward O. Wilson in Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge , "is that we evolved genetically to accept one truth and discovered another." Like Wilson's dilemma, Johnathan Haidt's two ways of finding truth were accepted in most pre-modern cultures as two universal ways of thinking, speaking, and acquiring knowledge. While Wilson called the two roads to truth the transcendentalist and the empiricist world views, and Haidt called them the lawyer and the scientist, the ancient Greeks called these two ways of thinking mythos and logos. "Is there a way to erase the dilemma," Wilson went on to ask, "to resolve the contradictions between the transcendentalist and the empiricist world views?" Answering his own question, Wilson wrote, "No, unfortunately, there is not. Furthermore, a choice between them is unlikely to remain arbitrary forever. The assumptions underlying the two