Skip to main content

Religion & The Matrix

In the movie “The Matrix,” Neo is trying to free himself from an illusion, which makes the movie a perfect analogy for person trying to free themselves from a religion. Religion is a glorified system of thinking that venerates certain necessary “beliefs” as if they are absolutely true. The only reason those “true” beliefs have yet to solve all the world’s problems, those who peddle their brand of religion will assure you, is because not enough people have accepted those “beliefs” to be infallibly true. If everyone converted to Roman Catholicism tomorrow, so the thinking goes, all of the world’s problems would disappear. So why hasn't Catholicism, with all of its supernatural sacraments designed by God himself to "cure" us all, effectively "saved" our species of their sinful nature after 2000 years? Because that's just how sinful we really are! Indeed, even the death of Jesus himself couldn't help us! Just read the Book of Revelation, and you'll see we are a lost cause!

The matrix sold by religion is a prison of the mind that venerates this “belief,” and ways of thinking that support it, and condemns other ways of thinking that in anyway suggest this “belief” is pure fantasy. Tell a Catholic priest that “Communism is a better economic system than Capitalism,” and they will likely tell you the fall of the Soviet Union proves this is not true. Tell the same priest that their Catholicism has failed to “save the world after 2000 years, with over 70% of the world still NOT being Catholic,” and that same priest will defend his Catholicism and blame the people. This kind of intellectual relativism is an absolute MUST in religion, without which the religion would be unable to hide the fact it is simply a system of “beliefs” that has failed at least as much as any other, and often far more. But for the violence and extortion the Catholic Church has relied on for 2000 years, the Church would have died centuries ago.

But the ultimate goal of Catholicism is to create prison bars in our own mind. Those prison bars are what constitute the matrix, and they are formed by our own synapses. Those synapses operate like train tracks in our head, with the Church “approving” of our willingness to repeatedly reinforce the tracks the Church has laid down – like the fact we are born sinners and must fear hell our whole life – while also condemning any attempt by a person to lay down their own tracks – like choosing to believe you are NOT a born sinner and therefore do NOT need to live in fear of hell your whole life. Believe you are a sinner, and you need the drug of salvation being sold by the Catholic Church. Believe you are NOT a sinner, and you no longer need to spend your life groveling at their alter for their drug. You're choice. (But if you don't use your "free will" to pick that former, expect eternal fires as your reward. Praise Jesus!)

In the movie, Neo is attempting to "believe" he is not a gulity sinner who was purchased on the auction block through the blood of Christ, thus making him no better than a slave to the Catholic God (Church), while Agent Smith is merely social norms on the one hand, and Neo's confirmation biases on the other, attempting to force Neo back into believing he MUST believe he is a sinner that needs to be saved, and he can only be saved by being a Roman Catholic slave. Anyone who dares to challenge the sacred narrative offered by religion is a Satan, while anyone who only defends the story offered by religion is an Abraham who is willing to slaughter his own son just to get him so me heavenly rewards. The latter gets those rewards for simply reinforcing the synaptic bars of the prison they hide within becasue they fear the world and all of its diversity, or because they fear that God will torture them for all etnerity if they do NOT slaughter their own children. (In Gaithersburg, Maryland, a few years back, a woman followed in the footsteps of Abraham and drowned two of her children in her bathtub because she believed they were possessed by demons. God's plan at work again!)

But one is NOT actually using their intelligence by sticking to the venerated ideas of a sacred tradition. Rather, they are merely duping themselves into "believing" that they are not a glorified robot. To think for one self, one must notice the sacred traditions and question them by daring to design new ones, which is what St. Augustine did to help manufacture the ROMAN Catholic Relgion, or live without them. Otherwise, what the belief system glorifies as "courage" is merely cowardice of thinking for oneself without the training wheels that were attached to one's mind, often through fear and coercion, as a child.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,