The Rant Institute

Another argument for the existence of God is the "Argument from Design in Nature." According to Prof. Peter Kreeft, this argument goes like this... "The universe is like a giant incubator, or a giant womb. It is exactly calibrated to produce human life. Life could never evolve if any one of thousands of extremely narrow windows of opportunity had closed. The probability of it all happening by chance is far, far less than the probability of the same one out of a billion betters winning every singe one of a billion lotteries every single day for a billion millennia. It doesn't take faith to believe that the game is fixed. it takes faith to believe it isn't." Kreeft continues.. "This is probably the single most popular argument for God. You find it among the most primitive tribes and among the most sophisticated scientists. Order requires an Orderer. If there is no God, no divine mind that planned and designed us, if our brains evolved...

"Cogito Ergo Sum" - I think therefore I am.  When the French philosopher Rene Descartes dug to the bottom of his philosophy, the only thing he found there amid the tattered ruins and bombed out shelters of his former beliefs, was the reflection of his own doubt.  Those doubts  "became a fundamental element of Western philosophy, as it was perceived to form a foundation for all knowledge. While other knowledge could be a figment of imagination, deception or mistake, the very act of doubting one's own existence serves to some people as proof of the reality of one's own existence, or at least that of one's thought." "The statement is sometimes given as Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (English: "I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am"). A common mistake is that people take the statement as proof that they, as a human person, exist. However, it is a severely limited conclusion that does nothing to prove that o...

This is a tribute poem to 9/11 stitched together purely from various poems by Walt Whitman. In other words, I like to think of it as Whitman’s tribute to 9/11. When the thunder-cracking guns arouse me,   and million-footed Manhattan unpent descends to her pavements, … I will sing you a song of what I behold …Libertad.   When the facades of the houses are alive with people, when eyes      gaze riveted tens of thousands at a time When Broadway is entirely given up to foot-passengers and     foot-standers, when the mass is densest, I too arising, answering, descend to the pavements, merge with the     crowd, and gaze with them… To us, my city, Where our tall-topt marble and iron beauties range on opposite     sides, to walk in the space between, To-day our Antipodes comes.   it moves changing, a kaleidoscope divine, it moves changing before us. When the fire-flashing, when rude ...

11 years already since that day in September when everything changed    oh how I remember A warm sunny day  the summer's last kiss  ended in tears for those we miss  as the sky was ripped open  and the world was awoken, from a dream to a  nightmare of “bombs bursting in air” when Giuliani became The countries mayor And police and fireman,  heroes without compare Great Britain played our national anthem in Buckingham square to remind us we’re not alone in the grief we all bear 11 years since a nation turned to God in prayer and we told all those we love just how much we care since vigils and candles scented the midnight air and God Bless America rang from the Capital stairs since bucket brigades tirelessly worked beneath the halogen glare and red, white and blue blossomed from everywhere since we forgot about  “who wants to marry a millionaire” and we ...

 Another argument offered by theists as evidence of God is the argument from motion. This argument says that, because things move, God must have moved them. God, so the reasoning goes, is the "unmoved mover" who makes all things move. God, in other words, is the Motion Maker.      On its face, this argument relies implicitly on the division made between potential vs. actual motion, which is a division based on an Aristotelian world view.  This world view, however, is as outdated a belief as that of a geocentric universe.  "The Michelson-Moreley Experiment of 1887 undid much of Aristotle’s world view" and, by extension, Aquinas’s argument (since the latter is premised on the accuracy of the former). "Special relativity further explained how “motion” is no longer a property of just “one thing” – the observer or the object – but of both the observer and the object," independently or simultaneously.  Special relativity, then, helped show how the ...