Skip to main content

Are Religious Beliefs Intrinsically Evil?


I do not think a belief in something like Christianity is necessarily intrinsically evil - although I am willing to consider, as Nietzsche did, that it might be. A belief is simply an interpretation of reality, after all, but it is not “real." Or, that is to say, it is only as "real" as we choose to make it. The problem comes when we start wanting others to accept that our beliefs are "real" and "true" while theirs are not. 

Generally, a belief can be good, bad, or neutral; but sometimes it is hard to tell the difference, and sometimes even a "good belief" can be believed in so strongly it actually becomes a "bad belief." And one of the ways this happens is when that "good" belief is held so strongly that it can be used to cover up any number of evils. 

For example, even if the Christian "belief" was proven to be perfectly true and intrinsically "good," it was still people's blind devotion to that "truth" that led so many of them to either conceal, or pressure others to conceal, the child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Pedophile priests, in other words, used people's devotion to their faith to prey upon their children. And all because these parents, once the abuse had occurred, were more interested in protecting their "beliefs" and their "church," than they were in protecting their own children, or even the children of others. 

Such concealment, by both friends and family alike, was not the result of indifference or malice toward the victims, of course, but was simply the result of fear. After all, what would they look like to their deeply Catholic friends, and how would they be treated in their deeply Catholic communities, if they were to accuse the church - and in a sense, God - of so vile an act? And even worse, what would happen if they could not prove their accusation in court? Indeed, just think of how difficult it is for a woman to report being raped, and for some, accusing the church of raping their child may seem even more difficult than that. 

Marlon Brando talked about this kind of devotion to a belief in the documentary, "Talk To Me, Marlon." He was commenting on how Americans had bought into the lie that was the Vietnam War, as the release of the Pentagon Papers in 1975 by Daniel Ellsberg would later prove. "They had these people so hog-washed," Brando said, " that rather than alter their beliefs, they sacrificed their children." Rather than accept the idea that their government was lying to them, more to the point, they choose to send their sons to die in a war on the other side of the world; and all for the "love" of God and country.  

Another example would be when a belief in a peaceful, self-sacrificing Christ is "believed in" in such a way, and with such blind devotion to those who claim to speak authoritatively for that belief – whether it be Hitler or the Pope - that whole societies of Christians think it practically their moral duty to either burn witches for God (as they did in the 16th and 17th centuries) or kill Jews for The Third Reich.

To put it in Christian terms, then, a belief is “bad,” therefore, whenever it becomes the mob mentality of the majority, and is then used as the measure of all moral “truth,” for everyone, in everything from sex to how one should keep holy the Sabbath – even if they would rather not keep it holy at all!  It is also bad to the extent it hurts and divides (which, to me, is symbolized in the pain of Christ and the “dividing” of his garments, as well as the division of his blood from his body – hence, death - which are also symbols of the the suffering of the Jewish people via the Diaspora, and so on), and good only to the extent it heals and unites (as symbolized by Christ’s forgiveness of sins and his resurrection – i.e. the re-unification of people as well as the reunification of his blood with his body).

For me, in other words, any belief that separates people in anyway, is bad, and therefore deserves - indeed therefore needs - to be questioned, as Nora Bateson put it in her documentary An Ecology of Mind, “until it bleeds with the authenticity of the un-separated.”  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Are Republicans Pro Life?

Most people don't realize that the Supreme Court has been in the hands of the Republican party since at least 1970! In fact, even in the landmark case of Roe v Wade that legalized abortion, SCOTUS was inhabited by 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and the vote was 7 to 2. One of the reasons is that the Republican Party has absolutely ZERO desire to win on the abortion issue. And that's because abortion gives the GOP a clear focal point with potentially unlimited organizing power. And it's an even simpler message to sell than religion, since we are "pro-life." (if that was true, however, they wouldn't be actively trying to repeal healthcare for up to 30 million Americans, nor would they be so pro-gun, pro-war, pro-death penalty, pro welfare cuts, pro- social security cuts, pro- drone strikes, etc). The Republican party officially became "pro-life" in 1976, thanks to Jesse Helms (R-NC). The only reason no serious challenge was brought within the pa...

How Capitalism Is About Killing the Poor

Capitalism is a religion. That's all it is. It is thought of as simply a way of organizing and running your economy, but it can only ever end up killing the "unchosen."And the "chosen" are the ones who were given great wealth, by God, or course. And they, like Abraham, are only too happy to sacrifice a world of Isaacs, if that is what their God of money commands. Look at the EpiPen ad AIDS medication controversy, when Mylan raised the price over 500% and Martin Shkreli jacked up the prices of AIDS meds, just because they could, not because they needed to make bigger profits. And look at the 70 fold price increase on a drug treatment for Muscular Dystrophy, charging $89,000.00 per year. For Spinal Muscular atrophy, they charge $750,000 for first year and $300K thereafter. In this way, capitalism sells long life the way the Catholic Church once sold salvation through indulgences. Both are highly respected and adored by the other, despite Jesus overturning the ...

The Clash of Religious Beliefs with Reality: Over Simplicity in a Hyper Complex World

God is the anthropomorphism of  our hope that life has a "happily ever after" ending, where there is no such thing as death and suffering, which we anthropomorphize in the form of the devil. In a sense, we are taking ideas and turning them into phantom figures of our selves, with angles and demons being projections of our own souls and our penchant for good and evil.  We see this when we anthropomorphize the act of gift giving into Santa Clause and think in terms of "old man winter" and "father time." We even reverse this process by describing ourselves as living in the springtime of our youth or the autumn of our years.  Religion takes this habit to another level, however, and teaches people to "believe" that the personifications we rely on to describe our hopes and fears are actual "beings;" beings from whom all of the characteristics we tend to associate with ideas of life and death, good and evil, necessarily emanate. Thi...