Skip to main content

With Liberty & Justice for Some or for All?


The past is the present rolled out for understanding,
and the present is the past rolled up for action.
Will Durant



Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death outside of her apartment building in the early hours of March 13, 1964, right across the street from where she lived in Kew Gardens, Queens, in New York City. A week later, a story came out that 37 people, who were in their apartments at the time directly across the street, witnessed the attack, but none of them wanted to get too involved by picking up a phone and calling the police. Since the attacker then fled and returned later to finish the job, the two attacks occurred over the span of 30 minutes, the second ending Kitty’s life. If anyone had picked up the phone, she would have survived. But they didn't.

It would later turn out that the news story that reported this yarn to the public was in fact inaccurate, but it nevertheless became part of the lore of our society, one of fiction based on facts. That lore served as only one of the various different cryptic meanings symbolized in the room number in The Shining, of 237: as two danced with death in the pale moon light, and 37 watched as if they were fuzzy pictures on a wall. It turned out there were actually 38 people who witnessed the crime, but only two claimed to have called someone about it: one called a friend, and the other the police, an hour later.  

Today, a black man was murdered on TV, and 328 million Americans all saw it happen - a permutation of 2 callers out of 38 witnesses; how ironic. And the protests today, where much of the violence is instigated by people who are not acting on the part of the protests themselves, are nevertheless still more civilized than how white mobs reacted to far less crimes with far less evidence a century ago. 
 
One hundred years ago, for example, one of the worst episodes of racial violence in American history unfolded in Elaine, Ark., a small town on the Mississippi. Estimates run as high as 800 African Americans ended up dead, 67 indicted for inciting violence, and 12 black sharecroppers being sentenced to death. What was their crime? They tried to establish the Progressive Farmers and Household Union of America to fight for better pay and higher cotton prices. 

That massacre was not an isolated incidence, however. Similar such massacres occurred that same summer in Annapolis, Maryland, and Syracuse, New York, and in big cities like Washington and Chicago. Hundreds of African American men, women, and children were burned alive, shot, lynched, or beaten to death by white mobs. Thousands saw their homes and businesses burned to the ground and were driven out, many never to return. And this all occurred over the summer of 1919, which, because of the bloodshed, was eventually branded as "Red Summer." It was the worst white-on-black violence in U.S. history.

In 1921, it happened again, this time in Tulsa, Oklahoma.  Known today as the Black Wall Street Massacre, this race massacre took place over Memorial Weekend, ironically enough, from May 31 and June 1, 1921, when mobs of white residents attacked black residents and businesses of the Greenwood District in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It has been called "the single worst incident of racial violence in American history."

The attack came from land and sky, as the mob rented private aircraft to bomb buildings.  When it was all over, more than 35 square blocks of the district – at that time the wealthiest black community in the United States, known as "Black Wall Street" – had been completely destroyed. According to a 2001 state commission, overall estimates of deaths ranged from 75 to 300 – of both blacks and whites. About 10,000 black people were left homeless, and property damage amounted to more than $1.5 million in real estate and $750,000 in personal property (the equivalent to $32.25 million in 2019).

What was the crime that kicked off such white rage? A 19-year-old black shoeshiner named Dick Rowland, was accused of assaulting Sarah Page, the 17-year-old white elevator operator of the nearby Drexel Building. Rumors of plans to lynch Rowland spread like wildfire through the black community, because such a practice was common in those days and in those parts. In response, people rushed to the courthouse to stop it. Tensions were high, shots were eventually fired but we have no idea by whom, and the race war was on. Charles Manson would’ve been proud. Because all you need is one person in such a crowd to be crazy and angry enough to want to see blood in the streets to start such a ball rolling.  

As if becoming a national pastime, it happened yet again, this time on January 1, 1923, in the small predominantly black town of Rosewood in central Florida. The massacre was instigated by the rumor that a white woman, Fanny Taylor, had been sexually assaulted by a black man in her home in a nearby community.  It didn’t matter that it wasn’t true. A mob of white men – or what in today’s parlance we would calls “thugs”- marched out, not to determine if it was true, but to capture who they believed the alleged rapist to be: a recently escaped convict named Jesse Hunter. They then marched to people’s homes like Sam Carter and tortured him to reveal where Hunter was. When Carter failed to divulge Hunter's whereabouts under torture, because being black did not make Carter a GPS system for all other black people, including black people he had never met, they shot him. When the violence was over, the town was entirely destroyed, and the residents were driven out permanently.

In the 1960s, a kinder, gentler form of social massacre was instituted, this time by the rule of law, under the ruse of Nixon’s War on Drugs. With the help of Ronald Regan and Bill Clinton (Clinton later admitted it was a mistake and apologized to the black community for it), that system has been kneeling on the necks of poor black communities ever since, as people escape the pain of poverty through drugs are labeled as criminals while in more affluent neighborhoods, people hooked on opioids are treated like repeat customers suffering from a disease called "boredom." In fact, even Regan's top economic advisor, Milton Friedman, called the war on drugs "completely immoral," as has Thomas Sowell.  As former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman confessed to Harper’s Dan Baum: 

"We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the (Vietnam) war or blacks, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities, we could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.


The only difference between the massacres of 100 years ago and today is that today the killing is carried out one at a time, on your television, in living color, while the massacres have been replaced with mass incarceration. And the brutality of the penitentiary is now pouring out into the public square, transforming the American flag into the effigy of a hangman's noose swinging from a tree, and the ghosts of a century ago now rise from the grave and walk among the living. And as officers morph into jackbooted storm-troopers hungry for blood, they beat and stomp on the innocent, as they chant for Chucky in a blood red tie:

one nationindivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,