Skip to main content

The Role of Religion

The purpose of religion is to prevent the exercise of a genuine morality by too many people - one based on empathy and the mutual respect for the absolute autonomy of the individual - by supplanting it with a manufactured morality that is  “intelligently designed” by the architects of a given society.

Those architects are always the rich and powerful, who keep and increase their wealth and power by always exempting themselves from having to obey the rules they ensure are imposed on everyone else, and always in stricter terms as one moves down the economic ladder. This is why St Augustine mentioned the difference between Kings and pirates is that one does with an armada what the other does with but a single ship.

Modern societies are structured around the ownership of property, for example, but there is never any serious consideration of the legitimacy of the distribution of that ownership, let alone whether property ownership itself is by its very nature immoral. So, people just accept such a system as legitimate, which is how and why slavery was accepted by so many people for so many centuries before there was any serious question of it by the majority of people in those societies.

But when you consider the fact that much of accumulated wealth is the result of the accumulation of stolen property, along with the various forms of slavery that were subsequently used to amass fortunes by exploiting those the law refused to protect or even recognize as equals, and when you further consider that laws were created to protect property rights far more than human rights, it becomes clear that for our form of society to exist at all there must be an inequitable distribution of wealth and power.

In a Ponzi scheme, as such, there must be more losers than winners, more suckers than sharks, or else the system wouldn’t work. If more people won in Las Vegas than lost, there would be no Las Vegas. So to, this is the case with America in general. But people go to Vegas nevertheless for the fun of it, and because they occasionally win more than they loose, and most importantly of all, because they want to believe in the game itself.

Religion works to sell the game, and to convince people that it is perfectly fair and even moral. And when it is ever unfair and immoral, religion teaches people to accept it anyway, because Jesus forgives and so must they, if they hope to have any chance of reaching heaven. And most of all, religion conditions people to accept their chains by convincing them that God will eventually even the score in the end.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,