Skip to main content

Fostering A Desire for Freedom Through Control

Sigmund Freud once said that because of people's desires, which if allowed to be followed to their natural ends would prove fatal to society, there would always be a need for some kind of control. Freud was a product of the intellectual and cultural paradigms he had been born into, of course, which is why his study of the human mind never included those who were born wholly outside of societies that had, at their core, an ethos for fabricating consumers just as much as submissive obedient citizens. 

Reinhold Niebuhr touched on this idea, and how the controlling elements of society were the root of so many of modernity's woes, in his book, Moral Man, Immoral Society. Such an idea was even echoed in Rousseau's quip that "man is born free but is everywhere in chains." 

The seed of this control starts with the acceptance of irrational beliefs, including the idea that it is necessary for any given society to have a ruler or king of some sorts, which children are first conditioned to "believe," and then fashioned to become emotionally addicted to and dependent upon, through religion. 

From this apple, which teaches them their Church or their religion is "like God, knowing right from wrong," all other structures of power find their legitimacy, and thus their control. Religions then claim that the "desire" a person feels, the "hole" they seek to fill, is one that can only be filled by God, rather than a genuine freedom from such ecclesiastical control. 

The "believer," by this point, has long since abandoned the notion that their "faith" is actually the root of the very problem it purports to solve, or that it is simply a control mechanism disguised as, and indeed marketed as, the only "true" ticket to freedom. (Even the devil would be impressed with this ability to sell bondage by labeling it as "freedom" but that is how all marketing works, if you think about it. That's why H.G. Wells said "advertising is legalized lying.")

 Like a drug pusher who has convinced his addicted consumers that the only cure for what ails them is more of the drug he's pushing, so religion works everywhere to convince people that the longing desire they have for freedom and happiness can only come from religion, even though religion is always the first link in the many chains we are conditioned to  wear. 

And like religion's claim to be selling "freedom" through the imposition of its dogmatic requirements for "salvation," so the "believer" enthusiastically works to forge their own chains by convincing themselves they are necessary to defend agaisnt all those who think they are simply insane.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,