Skip to main content

Belief-ism: How Religion is Like Racism

Religion teaches people that "beliefs" are what really matter, and that having the "right" beliefs is the only thing that can prevent a person from otherwise becoming a raving psychopath who would rape you as soon as murder your children.

 It is our "beliefs" after all, that are necessary for making people moral, without which we would all quickly devolve into cannibalistic savages. But for the rosary and mass at 7 a.m. every morning of the week, even grandmothers would be selling heroin to kids in kindergarten and doing drive-bys for a parking space at the grocery store.

It is this absurd notion that one "belief" is somehow better at making us more "moral" that leads people who subscribe to whichever "belief" is lauded about in a given society as being the one necessary for doing so, that makes them think that their "thoughts" and "ideas" are therefore better than the thoughts and ideas of those who do not subscribe to the same "belief." And all those who do not, like the Native Americans or African slave who were not Christian, are therefore expendable simply because of they do not posses in their brain the right "beliefs" to make them worthy of being treated like equals.

It is to assume, in other words, that only when someone starts with a certain "belief" can they ever actually contribute anything truly meaningful to the world, let alone discover "truth" and "meaning" and "joy," and all the rest. 

In this way, the color of our "beliefs" are interpreted as a kind of racism, as if the color of one "belief" should be ranked above or below the color of another "belief," which could properly be referred to as "belief-ism." 

Belief-ism, then, is simply the belief that my beliefs are better than yours - for finding happiness, promoting morality, understanding the nature of love and sex, interpreting the "proper" function and meaning of everything in the universe, deciphering the fabric of reality, finding cures for cancer, whether God exists at all, etc etc -  in the same way that racism is the "belief" my biology is better than yours. 

But it's my "belief" that such a belief is not only demonstrably false, but that it is precisely such a "belief" that has caused all of the very problems in the world, that every organized and indeed institutionalized "belief" system claims to only ever be working to combat. 

It is not necessarily the "beliefs" themselves, however, but the obstinate quest to maintain those "beliefs" in the face of any and all evidence or reason, as well as the absurd notion that by doing so, or even dying or killing for that "belief," one is somehow serving and pleasing a "God."

While it is considered the noblest thing ever to die for one's beliefs, for the sake of our eternal soul, it is a far nobler (and indeed sane) thing to let our sacred "beliefs" die instead, for the sake of each other. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,